More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    When I think of all the women & girls in my life that I care about, I remember that I could never be a conservative. It would be a betrayal.

    Assuming this is accurate, I’m pleased to see men in the UK bucking the trend.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    As women gain independence, frightened men turn to patriarchal solutions. Hence a turd like JD Vance spouting hateful and controlling rhetoric on podcasts and Ahole Tate brainwashing adolescent boys. Fuck these people.

  • puntyyoke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    A few folks have mentioned that these charts

    1. conflate liberal/conservative with the dominant left/right parties in these nations
    2. does not include people who do not identify with one of those dominant parties
    3. have some somewhat unreliable stats magic behind them

    A lot of young men in the US are reporting themselves as “not a Democrat or Republican”, and that’s causing a lot of this proportional shift. I would bet that characterizes a lot of folks on this site who are not conservative.

    https://www.vox.com/politics/2024/3/13/24098780/politics-gender-divide-generation-z-youth-men-women

    https://www.allendowney.com/blog/2024/01/28/is-the-ideology-gap-growing/

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      On the flip side, in Europe extreme right parties are mostly being propped up by young men, while in other age groups men and women vote relatively similarly, which supports this finding.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        This is your brain on idealism, just pure vibes. Political astrology.

        • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          Have you read it? Don’t judge too quickly!

          Actually on second thought nvm. If that’s you’re response then I’m out :)

          • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            43 minutes ago

            No, but like… dude, you could flip half of those supposed traits between categories and it would read exactly the same. That’s why I called it astrology.

            Perhaps you just did a bad job of presenting the book’s ideas, but I’ve just read through a summary of it and it didn’t exactly make me reconsider my knee jerk reaction.

            • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              38 minutes ago

              Thanks for explaining. I did a bad job explaining it, but I’m only taking a short break irl and am just jumping into this conversation. I’ve removed that section of my comment.

              The book explains this in more detail and I recommend it. We don’t get much deep discussion into what it means to be conservative/liberal and the purpose of the book isn’t to go into that but it does provide a framework. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Jacobs

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Exactly. I would be almost as upset with being classified as a liberal or a Democrat as I would be a conservative.

      • kautau@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        At the same time I know many people (my brother included) that claim to be “independent” because they think that the trump camp is somehow outside the conservative camp, and therefore respond “independent” on polls. Because they think “I’m not democrat or conservative, I just want to drain the swamp” and then support trump, who is literally a swamp.

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    As a Transfem, it’s because conservatives suck (granted I despise all forms of liberalism).

    Also why the hell is liberlism considered “left-wing” its center right at most.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Political education in the US and many of the countries that hold these polls is awful. I’d trust a middle-schooler from Cuba, Vietnam, or China more than an ivy-league-educated polysci graduate when it comes to political awareness.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    What’s the source? I wanna learn about the weird unexpected drops in some countries.

    • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      I think a factor is just S Korea’s working class being squeezed that much harder than many other places. They’re calling it the “gender war” but it’s all just people being forced to live in unbearable conditions while getting more and more isolated from each other.

    • killingspark@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      South Korea has one of the worst reproduction rates of the world, caused by women deciding to not choose a man to spend their life with but to live their own life. Which apparently causes men to freak out and go conservative

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    shit sucks which primes people for radicalization and The Algorithm basically pushes men to be chud shitheads (which doesn’t really work for women because who is going to listen to “become a baby machine” and think YEAH, BET)

    • TerminalEncounter [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’d be surprised, until they encounter what that actually means and will mean for them specifically - some conservative women trick themselves into thinking they’ll be given an exemption. Or they really just don’t what it means until someone like Crowder is brow-beating them and not letting them leave

    • Hydra_Fk@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Lol yeah woman were much safer, better educated, and financially independent historically. /S

      • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Read “why women had better sex under socialism, and other arguments for economic independence”

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Current trends will definitely continue and there has never been large sociopolitical upheavals in the past, and there definitely won’t be any in the future.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Current trends will definitely continue and there has never been large sociopolitical upheavals in the past, and there definitely won’t be any in the future.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Here, have some unsourced data on subjective tendencies.

    Nah, that doesn’t count as data just yet then.

    Especially not at a point in time where someone like Trump is said to represent “Conservatism”.