Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.

  • Seagoon_
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    New mushroom theory.

    The ex-husband did it and set up his ex-wife. He has most to gain. She had nothing to gain.

    • CEOofmyhouse56
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah I reckon she tried to off the husband and in laws for inheritance purposes. Plus they were probably interfering busy bodies. The meal apparently was a beef Wellington. Who doesn’t love a beef Wellington?

      • Seagoon_
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How would she inherit anything? They are divorced.

        • CEOofmyhouse56
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are separated. She doesn’t want to go halvies in the house. Kill him, kill the in laws. The house is all hers.

          • heyheyitskay
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m loving these juicy theories. I don’t know that much but I know if the cops are willing to put this out in the public then they’re most likely onto something. I was really curious why the food dyhydrator was seized. So what if they find traces of those mushrooms if she claims she “didn’t know”? I must be missing something here.

            • CEOofmyhouse56
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings.

              • heyheyitskay
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yeah I feel like unless there’s other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it’s all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It’s a tricky one because it’s very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn’t know. I mean this wasn’t sleeping pills or rat poison.

        • Bacon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          if they’re all dead her children would inherit everything and she’d get to spend it