Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.

  • CEOofmyhouse56
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They are separated. She doesn’t want to go halvies in the house. Kill him, kill the in laws. The house is all hers.

    • heyheyitskay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m loving these juicy theories. I don’t know that much but I know if the cops are willing to put this out in the public then they’re most likely onto something. I was really curious why the food dyhydrator was seized. So what if they find traces of those mushrooms if she claims she “didn’t know”? I must be missing something here.

      • CEOofmyhouse56
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not sure where the dehydrator comes in only that it was discarded the day after the poisonings.

        • heyheyitskay
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah I feel like unless there’s other evidence to suggest she planned to murder them or stand to gain from their deaths it’s all circumstantial or manslaughter at best. It’s a tricky one because it’s very hard to prove what someone knows or doesn’t know. I mean this wasn’t sleeping pills or rat poison.