Annabel Crabb’s analysis of parliamentary goings on this week.

  • eureka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Ah great, the term ‘enshittification’ is already going to shit.

    • Quokka 🇦🇺@mastodon.au
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      @eureka @Gorgritch_umie_killa If it helps, CoPilot reckons

      "still thinking of a playful use of an alternative word
      Got it! Here are a few playful alternatives to “enshittification” that convey a similar idea:

      Crapification: The process by which something becomes crappy.

      Bummification: When things start to become a real bummer.

      Suckification: The act of something starting to suck.

      Trashification: Transforming into trash-quality.

      Downslopification: Going down the slope of quality.

      Flopification: The journey from success to flop.

      Funkification: Things taking a turn for the worse in a funky way.

      These options keep the humorous and playful tone while conveying the decline or deterioration of something. Do any of these fit the bill for what you had in mind? 😊

      "

      • Gorgritch_Umie_KillaOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Meh, never liked the term.

        I never felt it captured the seriousness of the undermining of the public’s access to reliable information, by the ownership of these public sphere’s being captured by profit maximising entities.

        The temptation to skew algorithms to profit maximisation instead of best information delivery has proven too great, its why a fundamental shift away from the walled garden concept is required. In my view.

        • zero_gravitas
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          ‘Platform decay’ is more serious and more descriptive to boot.

          • Gorgritch_Umie_KillaOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Certainly is better. But i don’t think it needs a ‘technology industry’ specific term.

            Old terms like market monopolisation, or corruption of the public sphere.

            Or something like those are better, because nothing the tech platforms have done is new, their tactics aren’t different from any other company seeking to dominate their respective product market. The key difference being the speed at which their product travels around the world.

            • zero_gravitas
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              You make a reasonable point. I think there is difference, though, which is the degree to which ‘the customer is the product’ for these platforms, and that’s a key ingredient in Doctorow’s original post:

              Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

              Sure, advertising is nothing new, but the degree to which these platforms can target content and ads to the individual is qualitatively different to ‘old media’. Emphasis on ‘the customer’, singular, being the product, not ‘the readers/viewers’ as a whole.