Annabel Crabb’s analysis of parliamentary goings on this week.

  • zero_gravitas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    ‘Platform decay’ is more serious and more descriptive to boot.

    • Gorgritch_Umie_KillaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Certainly is better. But i don’t think it needs a ‘technology industry’ specific term.

      Old terms like market monopolisation, or corruption of the public sphere.

      Or something like those are better, because nothing the tech platforms have done is new, their tactics aren’t different from any other company seeking to dominate their respective product market. The key difference being the speed at which their product travels around the world.

      • zero_gravitas
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        You make a reasonable point. I think there is difference, though, which is the degree to which ‘the customer is the product’ for these platforms, and that’s a key ingredient in Doctorow’s original post:

        Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.

        Sure, advertising is nothing new, but the degree to which these platforms can target content and ads to the individual is qualitatively different to ‘old media’. Emphasis on ‘the customer’, singular, being the product, not ‘the readers/viewers’ as a whole.