• Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    I remember during covid I thought one silver lining type thing would be many many more people having to experience the shitty way the Australian government treats unemployed people who need help. Of course they got around this by temporarily changing it, which to me was a stark admission that it was totally inadequate in the first place.

    • Ilandar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not only did they temporarily change the payment but they also made it super easy to access, to the extent that many people who were effectively out of work just continued to be paid by their employer automatically as if nothing had happened. Even the genuinely unemployed people who didn’t have a job to go back to never had to deal with Centrelink, job providers or mutual obligations in a normal way. Everything was streamlined and very little was expected of people. No one learned anything from that experience.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes exactly it’s extremely frustrating. Everyone just forgot because it was ok for them when they needed help. If the system was actually working properly it wouldn’t require any changes for an event like covid.

  • Taleya
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Because we make national sport out of kicking the shit out of people doing it rough. You will serve or you will die, citizen

    • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Because everyone on the sole is lazy. Except when we need assistance in which case we’re just a battler needing help, but everyone else is lazy.

  • tombruzzo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    Love this line:

    “For some reason, it released the report on the Friday between Anzac Day and the weekend, so it didn’t get much media coverage.”

    Can’t be seen helping poor people. Can’t admit you’re not helping them either.

  • eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was long term unemployed and the ptsd from what i had to do to survive has made me a wonderful employee. I live in terror of losing my job.

    • PDFuego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I was absolutely miserable at my previous job but I couldn’t go back to being unemployed so I put up with it (while job hunting, which is just as bloody miserable) until I had a total breakdown one day. Now I’m in a much better position and enjoy what I do, but I still have a mortgage on an apartment looming over the rest of my life and losing my job for any reason would make my 10th story balcony look very tempting. It shouldn’t feel this way.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d vote for a ubi in a heartbeat, and lower home prices. I dont think i’ll ever have a mortgage and i don’t get how people do it without job security. I’d be even more terrified. Good luck friend.

        • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’d vote for a ubi in a heartbeat

          With you there.

          and lower home prices.

          The issue is just not that simple to fix.

          • macrocephalic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            There are a lot of things which can be done to start fixing it, but we won’t even do those. Get rid of the capital gains discount and make investment losses only able to be counted against profit from that investment (not other income).

            Then you can start looking at supply and liquidity issues.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    "Such demonstrably false premises lead inevitably to poor public policy, with services that are often harmful, unfair, complex, costly to administer, counterproductive and bound to fail.


    The original article contains 26 words, the summary contains 26 words. Saved 0%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

        • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s the case, they removed one level of nesting from the html. Anyway, it doesn’t look for Article_Body class, but any class that starts with Article_Body. They’re using randomized class names with the prefix being constant, that’s why I have to do it that way. I’ve updated it to this horrible looking selector: div[class*="Article_body"] > div > p, div[class*="Article_body"] > div > ul:not([class*="ShareUtility"]) > li.