Seagoon_ to Melbourne · 1 year agoDaily Discussion Thread: Sun 07 Jan 2024message-squaremessage-square112fedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down10
arrow-up14arrow-down1message-squareDaily Discussion Thread: Sun 07 Jan 2024Seagoon_ to Melbourne · 1 year agomessage-square112fedilink
minus-squarefullkitwankerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-21 year agoWhat’s > 0? She’s been replying like once every 12-15 hrs anyway. I’ll probably give up if I don’t hear back tonight. 💁♂️ Is it worth texting one more time or just let it be?
minus-squarePilklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoDon’t give up after one message. Especially since you had obvious rapport… she wasn’t talking to you for no reason. Be prepared for it to be a sign she’s not interest. But there’s no reason to jump to conclusions yet.
minus-squarefullkitwankerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah we had a good conversation going. I just feel sad, why am I so invested in this?? Also, do you mean maybe leave her another message before giving up?
minus-squareGibsonisafluffybuttlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoDon’t message again. It makes you look desperate. Move on and if she gets back to you, great. If not, whatever.
minus-squarefullkitwankerlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYeah, that’s what I thought as well but was confused by Pilk’s comment.
What’s > 0? She’s been replying like once every 12-15 hrs anyway. I’ll probably give up if I don’t hear back tonight. 💁♂️
Is it worth texting one more time or just let it be?
The ball is in her court, which is very apt
deleted by creator
Don’t give up after one message. Especially since you had obvious rapport… she wasn’t talking to you for no reason.
Be prepared for it to be a sign she’s not interest. But there’s no reason to jump to conclusions yet.
Yeah we had a good conversation going. I just feel sad, why am I so invested in this?? Also, do you mean maybe leave her another message before giving up?
Don’t message again. It makes you look desperate. Move on and if she gets back to you, great. If not, whatever.
Yeah, that’s what I thought as well but was confused by Pilk’s comment.