• fullkitwanker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What’s > 0? She’s been replying like once every 12-15 hrs anyway. I’ll probably give up if I don’t hear back tonight. 💁‍♂️

    Is it worth texting one more time or just let it be?

    • bull⚡
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      The ball is in her court, which is very apt

    • wscholermann
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      “> 0” means greater than 0. Meaning if she was interested she would have replied with at least something.

      As for the previous frequency, this only proves my point even more. Now that you are trying to make this “real” it’s radio silence.

      Personally I would do nothing. You’ve put the ball in her court and she’s not returning the serve it seems (yes I made a tennis pun).

      I personally wouldn’t text her if it was me at this point. It’s not worth your dignity.

    • Pilk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t give up after one message. Especially since you had obvious rapport… she wasn’t talking to you for no reason.

      Be prepared for it to be a sign she’s not interest. But there’s no reason to jump to conclusions yet.

      • fullkitwanker
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah we had a good conversation going. I just feel sad, why am I so invested in this?? Also, do you mean maybe leave her another message before giving up?

        • Gibsonisafluffybutt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Don’t message again. It makes you look desperate. Move on and if she gets back to you, great. If not, whatever.

          • fullkitwanker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah, that’s what I thought as well but was confused by Pilk’s comment.