• Cypher
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    Everyone else who pays taxes towards a program like the NDIS is giving up a little of their own quality of life.

    Hookers shouldn’t be getting NDIS funds paid to them when there are still people going without and this is part of balancing the budget to ensure the NDIS is sustainable.

    • Ilandar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Everyone else who pays taxes towards a program like the NDIS is giving up a little of their own quality of life.

      This is such a myth. Look at how much you are taxed each year and then take out the percentage that is funding the NDIS. It will be fuck all, nowhere near enough to affect your quality of life.

      • Cypher
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        More of my tax is going to the NDIS than to Medicare.

        I would rather funds be spent on Medicare than hookers but you do you.

    • Taleya
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Oh bullshit.

      You don’t apply this to aged care. You don’t apply this to military funding. You don’t apply this to schooling - i’ve no kids and am menopausal so why should i give a shit about giving up parts of myyyyy quality of life for your kids???

      Well i do because i’m not a fucking sociopath

      • Cypher
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Well that’s a lot of false equivalence going on, good luck with that.

    • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just tax billionaires more. It’s not that hard. Australia doesn’t have a budget problem, it has a not taxing billionaires problem. There’s no point trying to save money by taking shit away from disabled poor people. That’s pinching pennies while burning hundred bills.

      • Cypher
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Every government that has tried to tax billionaires more has been voted out.

        No government is going to win an election when smear campaigns can truthfully say the government is paying for hookers.

        Welcome to reality.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          So you’re celebrating a pointless penny pinching law legislating against people who already had their need validated in a court of law… Because that’s what other people think?

          Get your own opinions.

          • ikt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            a pointless penny pinching law

            Really?

            At an annual running cost of $35.8 billion in 2022-23, the federal government will spend more on the NDIS this financial year than Medicare ($30.8 billion), aged care ($27.7 billion), and support for state government hospitals ($27.3 billion).

            Penny pinching on one of the least productive, most expensive government expenses! Crazy! I have no idea why they are so focused on it.

            • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Okay now give the statistic for how much the hookers cost the taxpayer. You seem very confident that stopping the hookers will balance the budget, so you must have the figures to back your position up.

              • ikt
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                likewise, since you’re so certain it’s penny pinching feel free to post your numbers

                i support all attempts to reduce the cost of this massively overbloated free money train

                to quote the greens

                Senator Jordon Steele-John, the Australian Greens spokesperson for Disability Rights and Services, has claimed that the reforms will result in the removal of crucial disability services, stating that ‘the Labor government is choosing to remove $14.4 billion in funding from the NDIS that will lead to disabled people not getting the support they need when they need it’.

                Im not sure how $14.4 billion of tax payer money is penny pinching

                https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_departments/Parliamentary_Library/Budget/reviews/2024-25/NDIS

                • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  this massively overbloated free money train

                  Yeah, those disabled people should quit asking for a handout! Those quadriplegics need to get up off their comfy wheelchairs and work an honest day’s labour in a coal mine!

                  • ikt
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    awww they no longer get sex workers which is basically like sending them down a coal mine, i can see how that would be comparable to you

          • Cypher
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            No I’m against it because I don’t believe in paying for sex, that sex workers are predatory and undeserving of public funds.

            I was pointing out the political reality of the situation because regardless of my personal opinion the outcome will be decided by the electorate.

            Again, welcome to reality, sometimes life sucks and then you die.