🇺🇦Donate to help volunteer fighters defend Ukraine! https://protectavolunteer.com/ 🇺🇦

🌲Help plant tree’s, remove carbon, protect rainforest and more!

ikt has funded planting of 1,142 trees and the prevention of 53.74 tCO2e from being emitted

https://ecologi.com/ikt 🌲

  • 194 Posts
  • 1.15K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle
  • Then why are you defending it?

    I’m not defending it, you were just way off base about it and then decided to double down, who’s the AI now? 😉

    ChatGPT steals many of the features from other LLM’s and websites, bit like how Microsoft and Apple and Linux all copy and steal from each other

    Yes, the summary is right

    Great! Turns out AI doesn’t hallucinate everything, it might actually be useful! 🤣

    And if that’s the case then you need not worry! If you are worried about the accuracy of a statement you can click on the links provided.

    This allows you to do 2 things:

    1. on things you are looking for an approximation of you get immediate results (Benefit of using AI)
    2. if you would like to look further into the results you can click on the links like a regular search engine (benefit of integrated search results)

    Like how many times does it need to repeat the same thing over and over again?

    Because I want it to be and I like it this way :) if you prefer all responses to be more brief you can change it using the system prompt:

    I asked it to say the same thing but to be brief:

    The phrase suggests skepticism about AI’s ability to accurately summarize web content without introducing errors or distortions, likening the process to a “game of telephone” where information gets garbled as it passes through multiple layers (e.g., original source → AI interpretation → human sharing). The user is implying that relying on AI for this could lead to misinformation.

    The cool thing is that no search engine can assist in such a personalised way like this

    This is cool as heck:

    Anyway thanks for your time, time to sleep



  • I don’t use ChatGPT, I use LM Studio which runs Local LLMs (it’s like AI you can run locally on your PC, I have solar and a solar battery so this means there’s no co2 emissions from my queries, I primarily use this for coding questions and practice, translations from Russian/Ukrainian/French, practising french, etc), then I use mistral AI second (french based), then third perplexity (american)

    I also use Ecosia.org for searches as well

    I asked mistralai/mistral-small-3.2 to elaborate on what you said, Is this what you meant?

    The phrase “Let’s just keep adding more and more layers like a game of telephone!” is a metaphorical way of expressing skepticism or concern about the accuracy and reliability of information as it gets passed through multiple layers of interpretation, especially when involving AI systems.

    Here’s what it likely means in this context:

    1. Game of Telephone Analogy: In the classic “game of telephone” (or “Chinese whispers”), a message is whispered from one person to another in a line, and by the time it reaches the end, the original message is often distorted or completely changed due to mishearing, misinterpretation, or intentional alteration. The user is suggesting that relying on AI systems to search, summarize, or interpret web content might introduce similar layers of potential inaccuracies or biases.

    2. Layers of Interpretation: The “layers” could refer to the steps involved in using an AI system to access and summarize information:

      • The original web content (first layer).
      • The AI’s interpretation or summarization of that content (second layer).
      • Any further human interpretation or sharing of the AI’s output (additional layers).
    3. Concerns About Accuracy: The user might be implying that each additional “layer” (especially when involving AI) could introduce errors, biases, or misinterpretations, much like how a message gets distorted in the game of telephone.

    4. Hostility Toward AI: Given the context you provided (Lemmy users being “strongly anti-AI”), this comment likely reflects a broader distrust of AI’s ability to accurately and reliably convey information without introducing new problems.

    In essence, the user is cautioning against blindly trusting AI systems to handle information retrieval and summarization, suggesting that doing so could lead to a breakdown in accuracy or meaning, similar to how a message degrades in a game of telephone.

















  • Hate how NAB responded and hate old guy who got scammed and blames bank

    When NAB told Williams he was responsible for the missing $1,338 on that cool spring morning back in 2022, he wasted little time trying to prove them wrong.

    Obviously it wasn’t him, this was a shit investigation and should have shown up immediately, the fact he went way further than he needed to shows NAB were being dicks

    Williams did receive text messages a few days before the fraudulent transaction went through, with a passcode for him to confirm he wanted to add his card to a new Google Pay account.

    He was the one who fucked up ultimately

    But there should be a heavier push on banks to deal with fraud and scams, if they don’t then people may as well use buttcoin, when you fall for a scam there it’s gone for good