Australian Senate, last sitting of the year. No idea when the Social Media Ban debate is kicking off.

If anyone’s keen, feel free to give a live run-down of anything interesting in this thread.

(sorry about all the edits, just trying to get a decent thumbnail: elevated photo of the Australian Senate)

  • oahi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Is lemmy exempt I wonder?

    • eatham 🇭🇲M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      They prolly don’t know it exists. If they do, be prepared to switch instance as I doubt lodion will want to deal with Id checking

      • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I, and at least one other person here sent submissions in specifically mentioning the fediverse.

        Mine wasn’t a very technical submission, i tried to focus on the value and potential destruction of that value if safeguards aren’t allowed for nascent social media.

        So at least there is a record of it. My worry is all the Muskivites submissions will drown out ones like mine.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s not even clear yet what form the ID checking will take. They’ve rushed this through way too fast and without proper consultation. But there does seem to be some sort of a plan that the ID checking would be done by a government service in some manner, rather than users needing to send ID directly to the platform.

        • eatham 🇭🇲M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Govt service is still bad, still links everyones social media accounts to their ID. The bill will do jackshit anyways, as under 16s will simply move to social media hosted outside of Australia.

          • Aussiemandeus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            So of the top ofnyour head, a VPN will allow you to skirt this law?

            I don’t use social media beyond lemmy but be fucked if I want to give my I.D to anyone in relation to my online activities

        • melbaboutown
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          Last I saw the suggestions were drivers license or equivalent, face scan, or digital id. They’ve probably walked that back though or will do so because hell nah

        • Taleya
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          “are you over 16” clicks yes well your honour they clearly provided false data so it’s not our farkin’ problem.

          because honestly what fucking 16 year old has a proof of age card

        • oahi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Govt service, or privatised age-assurance face-scanning service wrought with error?

          • Zagorath
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Like I said, it’s not clear yet what form it will take.

      • oahi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I’ll take that as a no

    • melbaboutown
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The info is still really vague but seemed to so far apply to big platforms like reddit and facebook and X - however my info might be outdated by now.

      Then again it could be that the fines for non compliance and verification charges might also apply to smaller platforms with less available funding than the big companies, and push them under.

      The info I’ve been reading seems to be inconsistent and sometimes even conflict. And yeah, could be outdated by now

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      The relevant Minister will be able to give exemptions as needed, but unfortunately there is no threshold for any sort of minimum size requirement or for non-profit community groups. So we would probably, to be completely lawful, need to get chummy with some politicians who can reach out to the Minister and seek an exemption.

      (But realistically, we’re probably small enough that nobody would notice.)

      • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        it’s seriously annoying as fuck how there’s no exemption for any of these internet regulations based on size, all it it seriously achieves is strengthening corpos and depowering individuals with souls