You know how people make jokes about Thatcher and Regan’s graves being gender neutral bathrooms?

Who do you think qualifies, or will qualify, for that title here in Australia?

    • tombruzzoOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      He was a strong contender in my mind as well but he’s probably not buried here. I haven’t done the research to know for sure.

      • Zagorath
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        He’s buried in St. Mary’s Cathedral’s crypt, in Sydney.

        • tombruzzoOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Perfect. It would be easy for them to erect signs there as well.

  • maniacalmanicmania
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Rupert qualifies as #1 if he is buried here or if any monuments are raised.

    • Zagorath
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m of the opinion that if you’re not an Australian, you shouldn’t qualify for this title, regardless of where you get burried.

      • tombruzzoOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Was he not born here? He started out in Adelaide so I thought he was Australian enough. Chances are he won’t be buried here though.

        • Zagorath
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          10 months ago

          He literally made the choice to renounce his Australian citizenship. In my mind, that makes him less Australian than some random person who happens to have been born non-Australian and stayed that way.

          • NathA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            You are correct and he did do this - but it was purely a move to allow him to own broadcast rights in the USA. He needed US citizen to do that, and it didn’t really affect him in any other way, so he did it. He still maintained a base in Australia (as well as UK and USA) for the rest of his life.

            Is he still disqualified?

            • Zagorath
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              He cared more about getting broadcast rights in the USA than being an Australian. Yes, he’s absolutely disqualified IMO.

    • tombruzzoOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He’s another strong contender. People can use his office in whatever his next gig is

    • tombruzzoOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      He would be a strong contender. On a related note I thought Menzies would be appropriate. Not because he was overly horrible, but because everytime conservatives want name some new think tank or something they name it after him.