Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.

    • omoikiri
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      My worries aren’t about what it covers, it’s about the narrative it tells and the motives behind it. Anyway, I’ll reserve judgement until it’s done.

      • dumblederp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d expect it’d be written for entertainment with occasional inspirations of accuracy.

        • Bacon
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          i saw a twitter thread pointing out all the inaccuracies just from the american side and just from the trailer

          • omoikiri
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The trailer was quite deceptive. The trailers made it look like war propaganda, which is was not (not entirely anyway, and not in the way I was expecting). There were still a lot of inaccuracies that were conveniently glossed over, but as dumblederp said, it’s for entertainment purposes, you can’t expect 100% accuracy

      • Seagoon_
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Does it talk about the all the death camps in China and Burma where millions were murdered by Japan?

        • omoikiri
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why would it? That’s not what the film is about.

          Look, I get the point you’re trying to make here, Seagoon, but that’s not what I’m getting at. My work, my research, the organisations and individuals I work for and with are about making known the human consequences of nuclear weapons and nuclear testing. Not just the victims in japan, but the Marshallese from Bikini Atoll, the First Nations displaced because of British testing in Maralinga and Emu Fields, the downwinders of Utah, the Kazakh of the Semipalatinsk Test Site. The people who, if they survived the bombing or the test, are still living with the consequences. Nuclear weapons are created and wielded by those countries with money and power and they’re the ones who control the narratives around it, the stories were told about them, not the survivors, even though it’s their story to tell. They’re the only ones who truely understand it. My worries about the film were that it was going to be a bunch of nuclear propaganda, that fed the false narrative that nuclear deterrence is the only way forward, and I was pleasantly wrong. Forgive me if I’m touchy on the subject but at 90 seconds til midnight I don’t find these kinds of comments helpful.

          Everyone do yourselves a favour and go and watch this, read through this site and watch this interview with my good friend Mary talking about how the American government let her, her family and her community down after exposing them to massive amounts of radiation from all of the testing they did. Did you know that the brunt of radiation affects are born disproportionately by women? Or that it’s inherently linked to colonialism? Or that just the use of one bomb can and will cause a nuclear famine that will mean 1/3 of the worlds population will starve to death?

          This is what people need to be aware of when going to see Oppenheimer.