The messages also reveal a member of the group Lawyers for Israel calling Lattouf’s lawyer Josh Bornstein, who is Jewish, a “traiter”.
The messages also reveal a member of the group Lawyers for Israel calling Lattouf’s lawyer Josh Bornstein, who is Jewish, a “traiter”.
De-paywalled archive link: https://archive.is/zm3aB
Thanks.
Nicky Stein (Started his own firm, probably won’t fire himself but doesn’t mean his business is immune to negative public opinion)
https://www.keypropertylawyers.com.au
Robert Goot
https://www.statechambers.net/robert-m-goot-ao-sc
Debbie Wiener (Apparently has a history of being shit, ex. Going after Jewish DV victims and part of a Child Sex Abuse scandal)
http://www.mannywaks.com/blog/debbie-wiener-must-resign-from-unchain-my-heart-organisation-that-supports-agunot
https://www.vicbar.com.au/profile/6239
Lindy Blashki runs a dodgy looking “career consultation” company in Melbourne
http://www.castancareers.com/who-we-are
Anyone got a template letter for informing employers about the actions of employees outside of work and their reflection on the company?
It seems to me like the issue here isn’t that these lawyers wrote letters, but whether the ABC folded to pressure instead of following their own policies, and whether information was leaked from the ABC.
I’d say there’s something wrong with these workers of our legal system, clandestinely meeting together to harass workers for holding political views and terrorising public institutions to conform to their views.
They didn’t “harass workers”, did they? I think the ABC should also be able to withstand a letter-writing campaign and that “terrorising” is a bit of a stretch there.
Spurious threats of legal action might be of interest to professional bodies, though.
I’m inclined to agree. This is not front page news and arguably not even news.
Some Jewish people unhappy about an ABC reporter taking what appears to them to be an anti Israel position write a letter of complaint. The fact they are lawyers is neither here nor there.
If the situation was reversed and they were pro Palestinian complaining about what appears to be an anti Palestine point of view nobody would say boo.
Well, the lawyers involved think differently:
So I’d say that they’re lawyers is relevant in that they thought it would help them apply pressure, and it seems to have. I don’t think just anyone would be able to get a personal response from the ABC chairperson. What’s more is that they knew their threats of legal action weren’t well-founded.
Again? So what ? They are a lawyer and therefore can’t write a letter of complaint? They are entitled to do so and it’s not illegal to threaten potential legal action. If the court thinks it’s bullshit they’ll throw it out of it gets that far.
And again I make the point if it was pro Palestine lawyers complaining about a perceived anti Palestine commentary on the ABC nobody in the media would say boo.
It’s a beat-up over nothing and it’s not news. ABC management and their entire legal department are big boys and girls and they can handle tersely worded letters .
Now if the ABC caved to pressure and sacked the employee unfairly without due process because of these letters that would be different. But there’s no evidence presented that this is happen. Until then the media can shut the fuck up.
I think you’ve missed the point here. Because they are lawyers and not everyone else are lawyers and not every lawyer would understand every bit of legislation inside out their complaints carry more weight than an ordinary citizen. I would argue a lawyer threatening legal action is somewhat similar to a soldier drawing a gun (not because of the danger but due to their training and experience in its use).
I mean you’d be 100% wrong. I hate what they did but the right to organise hasn’t been taken away and well it should not, otherwise you’d be a potential criminal too.
I would not.
And frankly who said shit about ‘the right to organise being taken away’? You’re arguing against a point no one has made.