The messages also reveal a member of the group Lawyers for Israel calling Lattouf’s lawyer Josh Bornstein, who is Jewish, a “traiter”.

  • Quokka@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’d say there’s something wrong with these workers of our legal system, clandestinely meeting together to harass workers for holding political views and terrorising public institutions to conform to their views.

    • zero_gravitas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      They didn’t “harass workers”, did they? I think the ABC should also be able to withstand a letter-writing campaign and that “terrorising” is a bit of a stretch there.

      Spurious threats of legal action might be of interest to professional bodies, though.

      • wscholermann
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m inclined to agree. This is not front page news and arguably not even news.

        Some Jewish people unhappy about an ABC reporter taking what appears to them to be an anti Israel position write a letter of complaint. The fact they are lawyers is neither here nor there.

        If the situation was reversed and they were pro Palestinian complaining about what appears to be an anti Palestine point of view nobody would say boo.

        • zero_gravitas
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          The fact they are lawyers is neither here nor there.

          Well, the lawyers involved think differently:

          Nicky Stein

          Needs to be done again today … It is important ABC hears not just from individuals in the community but specifically lawyers so they feel there is an actual legal threat.

          Nicky Stein

          I have basically written to them and told them I expect a proper response, not a generic one, by COB today or I would look to engage a senior counsel. I know there is probably no actionable offence against ABC but I didn’t say I would be taking one - just investigating one. I have said they they should be terminating her employment immediately.

          Nicky Stein

          Just got this back from Ita Buttrose in response to my email (which was a bit cheeky threatening legal action I know)

          So I’d say that they’re lawyers is relevant in that they thought it would help them apply pressure, and it seems to have. I don’t think just anyone would be able to get a personal response from the ABC chairperson. What’s more is that they knew their threats of legal action weren’t well-founded.

          • wscholermann
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Again? So what ? They are a lawyer and therefore can’t write a letter of complaint? They are entitled to do so and it’s not illegal to threaten potential legal action. If the court thinks it’s bullshit they’ll throw it out of it gets that far.

            And again I make the point if it was pro Palestine lawyers complaining about a perceived anti Palestine commentary on the ABC nobody in the media would say boo.

            It’s a beat-up over nothing and it’s not news. ABC management and their entire legal department are big boys and girls and they can handle tersely worded letters .

            Now if the ABC caved to pressure and sacked the employee unfairly without due process because of these letters that would be different. But there’s no evidence presented that this is happen. Until then the media can shut the fuck up.

              • wscholermann
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Maybe if they were writing to an average Joe blow i might be sympathetic to your argument but they weren’t. They were writing to a large organization with a well funded legal team. This is not David and Goliath.

    • steakmeout@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I mean you’d be 100% wrong. I hate what they did but the right to organise hasn’t been taken away and well it should not, otherwise you’d be a potential criminal too.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I would not.

        And frankly who said shit about ‘the right to organise being taken away’? You’re arguing against a point no one has made.