With the Voice to Parliament Referendum date announced to be October 14 2023, this thread will run in the lead up to the date for general discussions/queries regarding the Voice to Parliament.

The Proposed Constitutional Amendment

Chapter IX Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples

129 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice

In recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the First Peoples of Australia:

there shall be a body, to be called the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice; the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice may make representations to the Parliament and the Executive Government of the Commonwealth on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples; the Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws with respect to matters relating to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice, including its composition, functions, powers and procedures.

Past Discussions

Here are some previous posts in this community regarding the referendum:

Common Misinformation

  • “The Uluru Statement from the Heart is 26 Pages not 1” - not true

Government Information

Amendments to this post

If you would like to see some other articles or posts linked here please let me know and I’ll try to add it as soon as possible.

  1. Added the proposed constitutional amendment (31/08/2023)
  2. Added Common Misinformation section (01/07/2023)

Discussion / Rules

Please follow the rules in the sidebar and for aussie.zone in general. Anything deemed to be misinformation or with malicious intent will be removed at moderators’ discretion. This is a safe space to discuss your opinion on the voice or ask general questions.

Please continue posting news articles as separate posts but consider adding a link to this post to encourage discussion.

  • Zozano
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Okay, then what happens when the football is dropped? What’s the worst that could happen in the eyes of both parties?

    • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is one of the no sides more compelling arguments.

      Its a consideration for all office holders, but more so if you’re the Liberal/National party that see’s a reasonable chance of holding power someday.

      Historically this side of politics interests have disagreed more often with indigenous nations interests.

      To disagree and ignore the Voice councils recommendations could leech political capital, and a resulting media storm could use up all the ‘air in the room’, so to speak. Undermining that executives ability to carry out their agenda.

      In short it can be an easy political wedge for opposition partys, or other interested persons to hit the government of the day with.

    • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The right is always the one who wins political Football.

      The voice will become an impotent political appointment to stuff a friend into as a favor like the appeals court or ABC Board. Nothing will change materially for indigenous peoples but settlers will get to pretend they aren’t racists because they voted yes.