• eureka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sometimes it’s not even about denial of what happened, but rather a mindset that the past doesn’t affect the present anymore.

      I often-enough hear people saying things along the line of, well, past generations took the land but society is better and less racist now, we collectively apologised, and my family weren’t even here at the time, so we have no obligation to do anything now. Almost like if my dad stole your car ten years ago, died after, and I say well I’ve never stolen anything in my life, it was my dad’s car, this car is mine, stop complaining about the past. It doesn’t make sense to start acting like equal treatment is fair after so much is stolen and so little is given back. But I know people who believe morality is that own individual behaviour, whether they are doing hurtful acts, and disregard their own position in society, how they got there and who suffered to allow that to happen.

      Guilt isn’t what people are asking for, guilt actually doesn’t do anything useful, but rather we need people to realise that it doesn’t matter that we personally didn’t commit massacres and seize land, because the consequences of those acts still disadvantage current generations of the victims, and it’s not resolved if we dismiss the consequences as someone else’s sins.

    • 01011@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Many. Pretending that you don’t benefit from past criminality is passively doing the same thing which seems to be the default of a lot of (most?) white westerners.

      • DavidDoesLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Criminality is a tricky one. What was legal in the past may not be legal nor ethically sound today.

        • 01011@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Criminal or not the golden rule has been around for a long time. Their actions were and are immoral, dare I say evil. People know that which is reprehensible, it’s those things that they do not wish to be done to them.

          • DavidDoesLemmy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lots of people eat meat today. I can imagine a future where this is seen as immoral and not following the golden rule. But for some reason, humans currently choose not to apply the golden rule to animals.

            Similarly in the past, they didn’t apply it to indigenous people.

          • ikt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Criminal or not the golden rule has been around for a long time

            So have wars over land

            Their actions were and are immoral, dare I say evil

            Welcome to the world, there’s a reason we signed up to a 300 billion dollar deal for some submarines and it’s not because we enjoy the look of them