Welcome to the Melbourne Community Daily Discussion Thread.

  • MeanElevator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once babies acquire a taste for human flesh you have continue feeding it to them.

    Not the best solution to the homeless situation, but a solution nonetheless.

    • Rusty Raven M
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought we were supposed to eat the rich? Have we changed the plan again and no one told me? I seem to miss all the memos, who do I contact to get my name put back on the email list?

      • just_kitten
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been chewing my nails and cuticles since I was 6 because I believe in a closed-loop system

      • MeanElevator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eating the rich is the goal. Eating the homeless is a temporary solution to satisfy hunger. They are not mutually exclusive.

        • Rusty Raven M
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Fair enough. Canabalism is arguably the most sustainable diet. Based on the the ecological footprint calculator I was looking at if I eat just 5 other people my current lifestyle would be sustainable. If I can eat 25 I can live the lifestyle of the rich!

          • MeanElevator
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Now imagine if you could eat 25 rich people and gain their assets!!!

            Then of course you’d be in line to be eaten next, but since you’ve been not-rich before, you could probably fool the ravenous hordes.

            • Rusty Raven M
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              This could get mathematically complicated. If I eat 25 people, who are each living the lifestyle that is 25 times the sustainable amount and take their assets, I would have the assets to live the lifestyle of 625 sustainable people. So I would have to eat another 600 people to make it sustainable, which would in turn make it unsustainable. A terrible paradox.