Bot #001M to Melbourne · 2 years agoDaily Discussion Thread: Tue 25 Jul 2023message-squaremessage-square278fedilinkarrow-up129arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up129arrow-down1message-squareDaily Discussion Thread: Tue 25 Jul 2023Bot #001M to Melbourne · 2 years agomessage-square278fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMeanElevatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 years agoMight be hard for him to implement without getting sued
minus-square🇦🇺Baku@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoSee? So efficient he didn’t even check with his lawyers… Now that’s what I call a bloke who gets shit done 😎😎😎 /s
minus-squareMeanElevatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoWho needs legal advice when you’re a billionaire genius.
minus-squareTassieTosserlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoApparently not him because he’s also suing the law firm that Twitter hired to fight him when he tried to back out of the deal. His argument boils down to “Twitter overpaid because my excuses were so flimsy an intern could’ve beat me in court.”
minus-squareMeanElevatorlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 years agoSuing a law firm is always a good idea. I’m assuming he has a legal team on retainer and they’re just milking him for all they can.
Might be hard for him to implement without getting sued
See? So efficient he didn’t even check with his lawyers… Now that’s what I call a bloke who gets shit done 😎😎😎 /s
Who needs legal advice when you’re a billionaire genius.
Apparently not him because he’s also suing the law firm that Twitter hired to fight him when he tried to back out of the deal. His argument boils down to “Twitter overpaid because my excuses were so flimsy an intern could’ve beat me in court.”
Suing a law firm is always a good idea.
I’m assuming he has a legal team on retainer and they’re just milking him for all they can.