• Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    ·
    1 year ago

    So you’re telling me I get free accommodation, free food, and it’s protected by a T-rex?

    • unoriginalsin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Humana last weeks without food, you think you’re going to starvea 7 ton, cold blooded carrion eater to death in a mere month?

      • Khrux@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        7 ton seems pretty big and I think they were warm-blooded, I recon they’ll start starving before I run out of food. They may not be dead by day 30 but on those final nights of starving unconciousness you could probably stick it with the knife. Large birds of prey may only eat once per day but they still starve within a couple of days, and the bigger they are, the hungrier they get.

        • SuckMyWang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Good point wait out the first 3 weeks then when it’s exhausted launch sneak attacks everything it closes it’s eyes. Plus if the T rex has no food safe to assume it has no water

        • RBWells@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Alligators and crocodiles can go months without eating. If needed, apparently, even 2 years. I wouldn’t count on a dinosaur being weak with hunger in a few weeks.

      • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean the brief is of you kill it you get a big payout but you otherwise get to live rent free in a hut for month fully catered. As consolation prizes go there are worse gambles and this one at least means you do not die.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Will the T-Rex be provided food? Because I could just wait it out. But if it’s provided food I’d just make sure it swallows the hunting knife with its meal and in theory it should cause some gastrointestinal leakage…

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    I get a roof over my head and food… For free!?

    The T-rex will probably die eventually from starvation… Which means I could lose my roof and free food. Biggest challenge will be trying to keep the T-rex alive…

  • soulless@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rub the blade into fecal matter, wait till she nods off and then stab deeply before quickly returning to the hut. Repeat a few times.

    Now just wait for the sepsis to kick in and collect the prize.

      • Surdon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love the thought that instead of pooping in the indestructible hut, then going out in sorties, throwing poop on its food, you decide to straight up pop a squat over the only food source while locked in an area with a t rex. You are a very bold person, your bravery has my respect, if not your intelligence

      • 257m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you think you are going to have a very pleasant shit with a goddamn Trex running at you? Actually now that I think about it you would probably shit your pants in that situation.

    • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Good question. Many modern day reptiles can go a long time without food. But a t rex is many orders of magnitude bigger than anything we have now. I did do a zoology major at uni, but my physiology knowledge sucks (unsurprising given I barely passed it).

      • Litany@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Theropods were warm blooded, like birds. They would not be able to endure without eating for weeks and months at a time like modern cold blooded reptiles.

        • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re conflating how warm bloodedness works in mammals with how it would work in theropods. They were warm blooded because they could not shed heat from metabolic processes due to their volume to surface area ratio, not because their bodies needed it. We still do not understand how it actually worked. This is evidenced by us still not knowing the reason why stegosaurus had plates, Spinosaurus had their sail etc.

          Also, some birds can go weeks without food during migration or injury. Further to this, theropods are many magnitudes of size larger than birds. They would have far greater fat stores than modern birds.

          Disclaimer, this is based on my 16yr old zoology major, and we are in a dinosaur discovery golden age so something may have changed.

          • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            We know juvenile T-Rex grew alarmingly fast, so high metabolism is in their wheelhouse. They were also rather optimized for running, so that warm blood may have been used for high-energy travel, like Tuna.

            That being said, they might be able to modify their metabolism based on food availability, but that would mean they slow down significantly when hungry. If they use torpor to subsist in such circumstances, that might leave it vulnerable.

              • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                We have over 40 T. rex specimens, and many more Tyrannosaurs. We can age them and observe growth rates by measuring bone rings, just like tree rings. Jane and Petey in particular had lots of new bone growth when they died as adolescents.

            • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Eh, big stretch we knew their young grew so fast when there is so little fossil evidence to indicate as such. I mean, there’s very few complete t tex fossil finds, and even fewer that are juvenile. You’d likely have more success throwing darts at a dart board than predicting anything based on what we’ve found. As for being optimised for running, were still not sure how that worked. I mean, a lot of big cats are optimised for running, but very few run for sustained periods. See lions, cheetahs, tigers, etc.

              Yeah, they could enter a torpid state, but that doesn’t mean they have to be vulnerable. We have many large reptiles now that do the same and aren’t at a significant risk of predation, if they were they wouldn’t do it. Also, we have some mammals that do the same and they aren’t predated to the point that they stop doing it.

              • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not a stretch at all considering the very well studied nature of the over 40 remarkably complete specimens we have. We can tell how much an animal grew from the thickness of bone rings, very much like tree rings. Tyrannosaurus in particular had massive growth after their thirteenth year, matching humans maximum growth spurt sustanied over 5 years or so.

                Tyrannosaurus feet bones were shaped to lock together and function as a sigle unit. This reduces the energy cost of walking and is only found in a few other groups of dinosaurs, all of which are long-distance runners. A similar situation can be seen in horses and other ungulates, and to some extent humans and wolves. Cats on the other hand have very open foot structures, being optimized for sprinting and flexibility rather than running.

                As for torpor, that was an offhanded idea, thinking about it again, torpor is usually used to conserve heat, so probably not necessary for T. rex.

          • Kühe sind toll@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the interesting question is, how the the lower oxygen concentration on the atmosphere will affect the T-Rex. Is it low enough to kill it? Will it just weaken it enough that the heat produced will do some damage? I have no idea.

    • BluesF@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure it could survive in today’s atmosphere, there was a lot more oxygen when megafauna like the T rex wer about.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is easy.

    As long as I’m getting food and the T-Rex isn’t, just sit in the hut and wait.
    T-Rex will pass out of hunger and thirst. Once it stops moving I wait a day or two then finish the job with the knife.

    • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’ll defer to actual paleontologists (or anyone who drops links), but my guess is T-Rex could go a month without food easy. Most modern large reptiles typically go a long time between meals.


      Edit: following the intense scholarship in this thread, I have changed my stance. T-Rex probably would not survive a month without food (or water). BUT ALSO, the entity setting the rules and betting 500 mil on it surviving is going to know that. So the Dino’s getting fed either way.

      • pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m also no dinologist, but wouldn’t the T-Rex be used to higher mix of oxygen in the atmosphere? I wonder if it would just pass out from hypoxia

      • Gort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Unlike modern reptiles, the T-rex was warm blooded, much like their close relatives birds, so their metabolic rate would be higher than, say, crocodiles, lizards, turtles, etc. Their food needs would be way higher than cold blooded reptiles, so a month without food would be more challenging. Might survive a month if it gorged itself beforehand, but quite likely not.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dinosaurs were not reptiles. Reptiles already existed when dinosaurs evolved and there are completely different evolutionary lineage.

        • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m just copy & pasting Wikipedia;

          Dinosaurs (including birds) are members of the natural group Reptilia. Their biology does not precisely correspond to the antiquated class Reptilia of Linnaean taxonomy, consisting of cold-blooded amniotes without fur or feathers. As Linnean taxonomy was formulated for modern animals prior to the study of evolution and paleontology, it fails to account for extinct animals with intermediate traits between traditional classes.

          But reptiles is more a culturally based category than a strictly defined biological class, so you might prefer a definition that excludes dinosaurs, and that’s fine. I’ll admit, it seems odd to class birds as reptiles, and strictly speaking if you exclude birds you should exclude dinos too.

          • Klear@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Here’s the thing. You said “dinosaurs are reptiles.”

            Are they in the same class? Yes. No one’s arguing that.

            As someone who is a scientist who studies dinosaurs, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls dinosaurs reptiles. If you want to be “specific” like you said, then you shouldn’t either. They’re not the same thing.

            If you’re saying “reptile class” you’re referring to the taxonomic grouping of Reptilia, which includes things from snakes to turtles to lizards.

            So your reasoning for calling a dinosaur a reptile is because random people “call the scaly ones reptiles?” Let’s get fish and pangolins in there, then, too.

            Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It’s not one or the other, that’s not how taxonomy works. They’re both. A dinosaur is a dinosaur and a member of the reptilia class. But that’s not what you said. You said a dinosaur is a reptile, which is not true unless you’re okay with calling all members of the reptilia class reptiles, which means you’d call microraptors, jackdaws, and other birds reptiles, too. Which you said you don’t.

            It’s okay to just admit you’re wrong, you know?

          • Gort@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            What I also find interesting is that the nearest extant animals to birds are crocodilians. Both belong to the archosaur clade, even if there’s around a 240 million years gap between them.

            As you say, birds can be classified as belonging to reptiles under the cladistic route, but they’re quite radically different to the reptiles that live today, so are seen as not really reptilian. It’s not surprising, seeing that the link between crocodiles, true reptiles in all senses, and birds were the dinosaurs, who disappeared 65 million years ago. A whole lot of evolutionary change in that time.

        • Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on how pedantic you want to be regarding the term “dinosaur” Dimetrodon and plesiosaurs for instance are reptiles but if you buy a pack of plastic dinosaurs for your kid the odds are damn near 100 percent those are gunna be in there. Not applicable to the T-Rex I know but it’s like the whole debacle of “what counts as a berry” thing. Like sure a blackberry is an aggregate drupe but it is culturally a valid answer to “what’s your favorite berry?”

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That is not even a little true. If it was your phylogeny would mean crocodillians aren’t reptiles.

            • Communist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It is your phylogeny (not philosophy), you’re proposing a different phylogeny than science does.

              Archosaurs, such as crocodillians, diverged from a common ancestor BEFORE birds/dinosaurs did, from other reptiles.

              In order for what you’re saying to be true, we’d have to exclude crocodillians from being reptiles. No standard definition would not include crocodillians as reptiles. In modern taxonomy, we use what are called monophyletic groups to determine relatedness. Because of this, birds and all dinosaurs fall under the clade archosauria, and are therefore reptiles.

              In essence, what you’re proposing would be like saying “Your cousin is a reptile, but not your brother”

      • filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure it would be possible for such large animals, they require a lot more energy to keep the heat up due* to larger skin surface.
        I could be wrong though, happy to be corrected.

        • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Square-cube law would be in effect - for large animals, things that scale with mass or volume outpace things that scale with surface area. Though what result that would have in this case I can’t quite puzzle out.

        • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Now you mention it, the rules don’t say that you get water.

          And, it only says you get food. It doesn’t explicitly say that the T-Rex doesn’t. You could argue it wouldn’t be a fair fight if he didn’t.

  • Killing_Spark@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s green text but come on. Even T-Rex sleep. Wait for that, poke its eyes out, cut its tendons and then just go death by a thousand cuts on that big lizard.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would take 1 week and observe the T-Rex from inside the hut. Make small, but safe, movements.

    After determining that I will be unable to kill the T-Rex I will inform the person running the game that I can not kill the T-Rex and would like to forfeit.

    The person running the game would protest, but eventually realize I am not going on provide any further entertainment.

    They’d bring in the professionals to corral the T-Rex and contain him.

    Those professionals? A secret team I’ve hired. My forfeit? I had my fingers crossed.

    With the T-Rex contained and drugged, I stab the T-Rex.

    The team and I split the winnings. Credits roll.

  • stingpie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People keep answering this in the most boring way. Here’s a slightly less boring answer:

    Wait for nightfall

    Sneak up to the dino

    Stab it in the eye

    Run into hut

    The T-Rex won’t be able to remove the knife, so it will become infected and eventually kill it.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the documentary Jurassic Park, a T-Rex can clock in at 35 mph. Plus, in the area of a football field, if you do get any kind of a lead, it can just cut you off when you need to turn.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I was doing some research to see if this is feasible, and found this page with this passage:

      (Though 12 miles per hour approaches the top speed of a typical human, depending on conditioning—it equates to a 20-second 100 meter dash or a 5-minute mile—the T. rex’s slow acceleration and inspiring teeth would give the average runner a reasonable chance of outsprinting or outmaneuvering the lumbering predator.)

      So yeah I’m gonna spend 3 weeks training to run in the indestructible bunker, then I’m gonna spend every day for a week sprinting around the T-Rex until it can’t follow me anymore. It will still be able to lash out after it collapses, so you can’t just walk up and kill it, but you can harass it any time it tries to take a break to eat or drink for a few days. Eventually it’ll be too weak to lash out, and you can safely walk up and cut a major artery or something.

      Or you can stab it with a poop knife while it’s asleep in the first few days, and have it die from an infection over the course of a few weeks

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would wait for it to fall asleep and then make a big anti T-rex circle around it so it cant escape.