• jmd_akbar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    You mean constantly bumping the prices for lower quality content is causing subscription numbers to go down? No way… Who could have thought that? /s

    • MüThyme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Considering there was another article saying that streaming services have no reason to not continuing increasing prices, I’m very fucking confused

      • Nonameuser678OP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        This article is based on an Australian consumer study. So it might be just us that’s saying yeah nah fuck this while the rest of the world is still willing to pay.

        • jonesy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          We have a history of being very adept sailors, the early days of Netflix where a huge library of content was available on demand for a reasonable price meant it didn’t make sense to go to the trouble of taking to the seas because the legal alternative was a better experience. Now that the market is fragmented and you have to pay through the nose to have the same level of variety, it’s not surprising Australians are some of the first to jack up.

          I would be interested to see if there had been a commensurate increase of ships on the high seas from Australia.

          • Salvo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think this is the reason. I think it is purely because there is nothing new worth watching.

            The writers/actors strike means that there will be no new content for at least the next 6 months. All except the most Potatoish TV Viewers have reached saturation point on current content and after COVID, people want to get out of the house and do things, rather than languish at home.

            The whole point of Cable cutting was so we could ditch the $60 Foxtel bill and just have our $100 Internet bill. If we have to pay for AppleTV+, Netflix, Prime, YouTube Premium, Stan, Kayo and Binge, it add up to much more than a Foxtel bill.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve never subscribed to any streaming services but don’t we usually have a shitty selection of the content available in other places?

          • zurohki
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is why we’re such skilled sailors - other countries got things cheap on Netflix that in Australia were locked behind a $100/month Foxtel subscription.

      • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, the number of subscribers might shrink, but if the fee is a lot higher, overall revenue might be up

        • ares35@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          cable tv operated like that for years in the u.s. constant rate increases to counter dwindling subscriber numbers to keep the overall profits growing.