• Nonameuser678
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d prefer they use the funding to build houses or raise jobseeker tbh…

    • MortyMcFry 🇦🇺
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But does housing inspire the youth of Australia?

      In seriousness, yes housing seems to be the better option.

    • Yendor@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      $44m over their term is about 15 houses per year. Considering they plan to bring in 400,000 new migrants per year, I’m not sure defunding women’s sports to build 15 houses is really going to make much of a dent in the housing market.

  • Anonbal185
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Encourage young footballers and ship them off early to Europe to play (preferably England so they’re guaranteed English language skills). But many go into international skills in non english speaking countries and you can’t tell the difference.

    And then hope they play for Australia. There’s no way we’ll ever match them in investment so might as well leverage their resources to train our players.

  • Whirlybird
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. The federal government shouldn’t be funding sports, especially women’s soccer which provides less than zero return on investment. 99% of the people caught up in Matilda fever won’t watch another game or go to another game unless we get another World Cup.

    • 86ZapsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This tournament alone has already generated hundreds of millions of dollars for the economy. Not to mention the outright positive social, mental and physical health ramifications of football inspiring a whole generation of kids to play sport.

      less than zero return on investment

      You could not be more wrong.

      • Whirlybird
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This tournament alone has already generated hundreds of millions of dollars for the economy.

        We don’t have a world cup hosted here every year though, so that’s besides the point.

        Not to mention the outright positive social, mental and physical health ramifications of football inspiring a whole generation of kids to play sport.

        Soccer clubs already exist. Hell I played soccer for 10 years myself socially. Why does the federal government need to fund anything when it already exists?

        You could not be more wrong.

        Almost all of the womens sports leagues run at a loss and are propped up by the mens leagues. FIFA themselves said at their estimates this entire world cup will break even at best.