• fukhueson@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      While yes, it’s most likely not a significant factor in the drop in crime:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead–crime_hypothesis#%3A~%3Atext%3DA_2007_report_published_by%2C%25_decline_in_violent_crime".?wprov=sfla1

      Systematic reviews / meta-analysis

      The first meta-analysis of the lead-crime hypothesis was published in 2022. “The Lead-Crime Hypothesis: A Meta-Analysis”, authored by Anthony Higney, Nick Hanley, and Mirko Moro consolidates findings of 24 studies on the subject. It found that there is substantial evidence linking lead exposure to a heightened risk of criminal behavior, particularly violent crimes. This aligns with earlier research suggesting lead exposure may foster impulsive and aggressive tendencies, potential precursors to violent offenses. The study concluded that, while a correlation between declining lead pollution and declining criminality is supported by research, it is likely not a significant factor in reduced crime rates, and that the link is generally overstated in lead-crime literature.

      The study’s implications point towards the potential benefits of reducing lead exposure to decrease crime rates. Such reductions could be achieved through initiatives like removing lead from products like gasoline and paint, water pipes and enhancing lead abatement measures in schools and residences.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    The problem is that the news keeps hounding the police for arrest headlines to run every night

    Like do we actually need to hear what specific crimes are being committed by complete randos every day if it isn’t changing the commute?

    What specific public interest is served by every day announcing the specific crimes that were committed that day?

    • TexasDrunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Local news lost a lot of eyes to the 24 hour news channels so they want to report the absolute most eye grabbing thing they can so they can sell eyeballs to advertisers. The big channels need to fill space in their 24 hour cycle so they blow shit way the fuck up. They also thrive on every election being a horse race and polarization.

      The joke years ago was that the news always had shit like “Could your tap water be killing you? Watch News at 10 to find out!” Then you couldn’t drink tap water until 10 because it might kill you. That doesn’t hold up anymore so now it’s any random crime they can report on.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah that’s kinda my point, the 24 hour news cycle itself is what’s causing this. It needs to be cut back at to a morning and evening edition and if you publish outside those windows too often you don’t get to call yourself or present yourself as a news or news commentary organization.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m traveling to NYC in a few weeks with my family. My parents are shocked to hear we are using the subway. I told them not to worry, I left the cat to them in my will.

  • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Crimes have to be reported and accepted as crimes to be considered crimes in crime statistics.

    Edit: wow this criticism of police went terribly. Kinda surprised.

      • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Maybe. But, I’ve filed several police reports in the past couple years. Things like car break-ins, firearm brandishing on the freeway, package theft with enough info to easily catch them, etc. no one ever calls back. It’s a good thing I don’t need “god” to be good haha.

    • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Actually, even counting genocide, as much as there is right now, it is also on a decline, there used to be more. It’s harder to keep it secret now. Which makes it seem like it’s happening more, because we hear about it more, but it’s actually one of the factors that makes it less common now.

      • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Killing 40000 civilians is genocide. You guys like to play dumb but the usa will soon pay the price of ignorance

        • jimrob4@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So it’s ok when terrorists kill civilians, but not when the country getting blown up by suicide bombers defends itself. 👍🏻

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I get that you’re mad your biggest enemy has some posted positive news.

      Stay mad you fuckwit 🤡