• Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    25 days ago

    Not to victim blame too much, but when you’re starting your own business, you should probably stop just signing stuff you haven’t read and relying solely on consumer protection.

    • Ilandar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      I suspect you didn’t bother to read the article, because if you had you would know that she was in a desperate situation because of the impact of COVID on her business. Many people, including small business owners, were really struggling during that period and made poor decisions as a result. It is pretty low to sit here years later and act like they were just stupid.

      • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        25 days ago

        As a small business owner, I know the feeling, and I absolutely think this shit should be illegal. But on the other hand, as a business owner, you DO have a responsibility, and unlike random consumers, there’s an expectation you have some ability to read and comprehend your contracts. You make the choice to be a business owner, you don’t freely chose to be a consumer, and that’s a very good reason why consumers need more protection.

        The main quote of the article is “We took on a loan that we knew nothing about, basically”. That is 100% your own fault, and while the lender is absolute scum, at least a small fraction of the blame lies on the people who don’t understand what they, as a business, are agreeing to.

        • Ilandar
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          25 days ago

          You’re just repeating the same thing again, only longer. No one is suggesting the small business owners weren’t also to blame. They themselves will know that they fucked up and that only increases the mental toll. It is dickhead behaviour to go around doing “welp you should have done X, it’s your own fault” thing way after the fact without offering any sympathy or assistance. It’s similar with people who fall victim to phishing or phone scams; you are only perpetuating the stigma they feel by reacting like this to their situation.

          • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            And you’re repeating as well. If we’d expect the victim to read this I’d be with you - this audience here seems a different one though: and if the harsh tone of (edit) thread OP encourages even one founder to read one more contract than that’s a good thing.

            Perhaps the statement should be stronger worded as: look at this small business owner and learn! She paid for your education!

            Simply saying “don’t talk about what could’ve been done different” perpetuates not the stigma but the abuser instead.

            • BakuOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              24 days ago

              and if the harsh tone of OP

              To be clear: this isn’t my headline, I don’t change headlines unless it’s overly clickbaity or unclear. It’s the headline the ABC initially wrote (so shows up when browsing the headlines in their app), and is also the suggested title Lemmy/third party apps offer to auto fill after the link is submitted

            • Ilandar
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              24 days ago

              If we’d expect the victim to read this I’d be with you

              It’s not about the individual literally reading that exact comment. It’s about the discourse in our society. If we want to de-stigmatise this experience for victims then we can start by approaching their situation with sympathy and empathy instead of just lecturing them like they’re a small child.

              and if the harsh tone of OP encourages even one founder to read one more contract than that’s a good thing.

              Again, there are already quotes in the article that do this. There is no need for the people commenting on it to have a circlejerk about any mistakes the victim may have made. Don’t make this out as some kind of altruistic thing - everyone knows that people only do this to feel better about themselves. Be and do better.

              • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                24 days ago

                Well you seem to know more about why people do what they do than I do. But as “everyone” knows I simply must be behind.

                • Ilandar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  Not behind, just in denial that your attitudes and behaviour could be contributing to a problem in society.

          • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            It is dickhead behaviour to go around doing “welp you should have done X, it’s your own fault” thing way after the fact without offering any sympathy or assistance. It’s similar with people who fall victim to phishing or phone scams; you are only perpetuating the stigma they feel by reacting like this to their situation.

            But it’s NOT similar to phising. That’s my whole point. A random consumer shouldn’t be expected to grasp the fine details, they didn’t volunteer to exist in a society and should be protected against threats they don’t understand, like phising, predatory loans, etc.

            But for a company, it’s different. They literally DID sign up for this, and should be expected to grasp the details. You voluntarily take on this responsibility when you start a company, very much unlike some random person getting scammed.

            Like other peope, if you start a business: Reader beware

            • Ilandar
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              But it’s NOT similar to phising.

              I never said it was similar to phishing. Read my comment again. I was clearly referring to the impact of stigmatisation on the victim. Phishing and phone scam victims also often feel an extreme burden of guilt because they believe they acted stupidly in blindly trusting a link or a person who cold called them. Reinforcing this guilt by telling them “yes you are stupid and you fucked up” doesn’t help them. It has the exact opposite effect.

              I don’t know why you keep trying to frame this as “they started their business and instantly made a mistake because they can’t/didn’t read”. The article is about small business owners being taken advantage during periods of severe financial stress. We are not discussing happy people fucking up due to some innate character flaw. We are talking about people who are suffering from extreme stress and making irrational decisions as a result. Lecturing them as if they didn’t sign these contracts as an absolute last resort, in exceptional circumstances is not helpful in any way.

              • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                24 days ago

                We are not discussing happy people fucking up due to some innate character flaw. We are talking about people

                No, we are not talking about people at all. We are talking about companies. Again, if we were talking about people, I would agree with you 100%, but we’re not. This is one company making a contract with a different company. Companies are legally distinct from people for very good reasons, and this is one of them.

                Of course, there are reallife human behind those companies. And if those people had made these choices as individual people, they would in fact be protected under the law. But they chose NOT to be protected under those laws so they could operate as a company with the ups and down that entails. They voluntarily took this risk to get the benefits of running a company, and now they are crying that they didn’t know any better. It doesn’t work like that, if you don’t want to be treated as a company, don’t be one. You don’t get to have all the advantages on one hand, and none of the disadvantages on the other.

                I want to re-emphasize this: You can absolutely do this work as a private individual. Mia Li, the window-frame importor from the article could have done all her business as a private individual, but she obviously didn’t, probably because that comes with some big downsides in taxes. She voluntarily started a company, chosing the waive the very protections she had as a private person, in order to get benefits in the form of tax advantages and other things. And now that she suffers the downsides from her own choises (that choice of starting a business, that she made well before covid), she’s upset that she’s not shielded from the consequences of her actions like a regular consumer would be.

                I don’t feel sorry for people when they their voluntary, intentionally risky, actions have consequences. When you chose to forego risk-mitigation in order to recieve financial benefits, you’re making a choice. If that goes wrong, you literally only have yourself to blame.

                • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  Cool, but wouldn’t it be better if scummy practices weren’t allowed at all? That’s the society I’d rather live in, not the one where we rag on people for being “stupid”. Company or not, there’s simply not enough general education on running a business and I feel that this is really a barrier for those who want to run a business and live the capitalist dream. i.e. she could probably have operated as an individual, but maybe didn’t know any better or maybe she can’t because of some other arrangements. I think it’s hard to say they should know when they might not have the money or access to education, though I haven’t read the article myself so who knows, but I’m just considering the general case here.

                • Ilandar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  No, we are not talking about people at all.

                  The article is literally about individual people.

                  I don’t feel sorry for people when they their voluntary, intentionally risky, actions have consequences. When you chose to forego risk-mitigation in order to recieve financial benefits, you’re making a choice. If that goes wrong, you literally only have yourself to blame.

                  What happened to “we’re not talking about people”…?

                • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  24 days ago

                  It’s similar with people who fall victim to phishing or phone scams; you are only perpetuating the stigma they feel by reacting like this to their situation

                  I think this is the full quote the most important part being:

                  you are only perpetuating the stigma they feel by reacting like this to their situation

                  They’re not lying, you’re either being disingenuous or an idiot

                • Ilandar
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  24 days ago

                  It’s not a lie. The other commenter was implying that I was comparing the two on culpability and I clearly wasn’t, as I explained in the comment you’ve replied to.

                  But, of course, you already knew all this and are simply trying the lazy gotcha route because you are unwilling or unable to actually discuss the topic in good faith.

  • dumblederp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    I read the article because it was shorter than the comments. It seems the problem here is predatory lending. Getting a loan for $500k and then being paid $380k because they took payments out sounds very much like a Ukranian Mafia loan shark technique I just read about in Jack Reacher - Blue Moon.

    • BakuOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yeah, the comments are a bit wild at the moment