• ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cool, but wouldn’t it be better if scummy practices weren’t allowed at all? That’s the society I’d rather live in, not the one where we rag on people for being “stupid”. Company or not, there’s simply not enough general education on running a business and I feel that this is really a barrier for those who want to run a business and live the capitalist dream. i.e. she could probably have operated as an individual, but maybe didn’t know any better or maybe she can’t because of some other arrangements. I think it’s hard to say they should know when they might not have the money or access to education, though I haven’t read the article myself so who knows, but I’m just considering the general case here.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Good luck preventing all scummy practices.

      Not that we shouldn’t try, but to expect them to not exist is naive.

      • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m sure we could have legislation made about contracts which are human readable, no “fine print”, not obtusely long using legal jargon

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      If you assume incompetence as the default, as with most consumer protection, then it becomes basically impossible to deal business to business. Can a company lie to a consumer, and then claim they simply don’t know or didn’t understand? If your industry has a higher profit margin than mine, can I sue you for being scummy?

      The basis of consumer protection is that consumer can’t be expected to be experts in everything. The basis of business law is that businesses know what they’re doing in their field. If you don’t, you’re doing it wrong.