Cheaper electricity, less emissions and ready by 2035 are some of the Coalition’s core promises on nuclear energy, but are they backed by evidence?

tl;dr - no

  • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I can’t remember where but they mention in the report that SMRs were the most suitable form of reactor for Australia according to some industry consultation and it being difficult to realise the full costings of the large scale “traditional” nuclear reactors due to government subsidies, lack of transparency and different labour costs in Australia VS somewhere else 50 years ago.

    Do you think the Coalition (or any hypothetical but still possible Australian Government) could actually deliver nuclear by 2040? Given the lack of expertise and experience, as well as pushback from States and lack of private investment I think it’s really unlikely

    • muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hell no they got no chance delivering it on time and on budget but thats literally every single government project in the history of government projects.