I’m not a fan of articles like this. There’s so little detail on why the proposal was knocked back. It’s impossible to know, by the end of the article, whether it was a good or poor action by the committee.

Anybody got the inside scoop?

  • Rusty Raven
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    My guess given the comments about the other brigades in the shire is that using money to better provision the other brigades was considered a better use of funds than having an additional station. There are a lot of factors to balance in allocating funding, and spending the money to build a station to house a fire truck in that location might mean they end up with one less actual fire truck overall in the region.