𝙻𝚘𝚗𝚐𝙼𝚊𝚌𝚃𝚘𝚙𝚙𝚎𝚍𝚄𝚙

  • 45 Posts
  • 238 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 29th, 2023

help-circle

  • We have:

    • Preferential voting.

    • Proportional representation (at least in the lower house)

    • Independent organisation that sets seat boundaries.

    • compulsory voting

    • no electoral college system

    Our system is completely different to the USA. Granted our media landscape is still just as fucked as theirs.

    First preferences also result in funding going to that party provided it meets a minimum threshold. Putting others ahead of the major parties sends them a message to do better. It has also resulted in a number of seats being held by independents.

    Unless you actually live in the seat the party leader is in, you are not voting for that party leader / giant douche / turd sandwich.




  • Can be fairly sure they are in the USA.

    To grossly simplify a very expansive topic of concrete vs asphalt, vs bitumen…

    Concrete = more upfront cost, slower to built. It is more durable. Costs more to repair. Less traction. More noisy to drive on due to joints.

    Bitumen = cheapest up front to build. Less durable, but can still get a fairly good life out of it if designed to meet expected loads. Can be repaired more cheaply.

    Asphalt. Middle ground between the two. (It’s effectively bitumen with cement binder added) Most of our freeways, major arterial roads here are asphalt.

    Things that effect the choice: Different CAPEX vs OPEX strategies, especially with politics for public roads.

    Local availability of materials.

    Local environmental conditions i.e. freeze / thaw cycles we don’t have to deal with in most of Australia. High temperatures we do get, which does effect bitumen.

    Fair to say that costs in one country for different labour and materials look a bit different too.