• WhirlybirdBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      And with how vague the voice constitutional change was, it would be able to be dismantled in every meaningful way another 11 times in the future. It would just have to exist, but it could have been comprised of a 19 year old white intern who supported anti-indigenous things.

        • WhirlybirdBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Says the person saying how frequently they’re disbanded 😂. You’re literally arguing against yourself.

            • WhirlybirdBanned
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

            • WhirlybirdBanned
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

                • WhirlybirdBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Read my post again. I didn’t say it would be abolished, I said it would be essentially dismantled since it would be reduced to nothing.