• WhirlybirdBanned
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    And with how vague the voice constitutional change was, it would be able to be dismantled in every meaningful way another 11 times in the future. It would just have to exist, but it could have been comprised of a 19 year old white intern who supported anti-indigenous things.

      • WhirlybirdBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Says the person saying how frequently they’re disbanded 😂. You’re literally arguing against yourself.

          • WhirlybirdBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

          • WhirlybirdBanned
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t say it would be abolished, just that it could and likely would essentially be completely gutted many times over because like I said, the only thing that’s protected is the thing existing.

              • WhirlybirdBanned
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Read my post again. I didn’t say it would be abolished, I said it would be essentially dismantled since it would be reduced to nothing.