• skribe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    In the mid-70s, our population was smaller than South Australia (around 600k).

    • shirro
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      SA has struggled to be economically viable almost since the first settlers. While Perth might be shooting ahead now, I think it was on a similar trajectory to Brisbane for most of that time while Adelaide flatlined… South Australia is a difficult place to maintain long term growth I think. On the plus side without the boom you don’t get the bust and growth has its own challenges.