• Taleya
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Official statement was that the promised housing and sports facilities were still going ahead, just not the games themselves so win/win

    • mupAus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, opposition (and parroted by the media) is calling it an ‘embarrassment’ but IMO it’s a great thing. Money better spent elsewhere.

      • notleigh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree it’s probably the right thing to not host, especially given the ROI is bad (at least according to some other states…)

        But even though I think it’s a good thing, it is an embarrassment.

        Announcing that you’re going to host, putting money / effort state-wide into preparing, and then dropping it is embarrassing. It sends a message that you can’t adequately plan for large events, and that your commitments aren’t worth much. I can’t really blame the opposition for trying to make some hay from it.

        • Worth noting that they only looked at it because nobody else would host it for the same reasons they’re dropping it now. Once fully costed figures were in it didn’t make sense.

          The Commonwealth Games themselves need to rethink their entire approach if they want to continue to exist entirely.