• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The observation program was intended to fund satellites that would be used to provide data for everything from weather forecasting to GPS to natural disaster response.

    “This is an industry-wide hit,” Bec Shrimpton, the director of Defence Strategy and National Security at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI) told 7.30.

    In an interview with 7.30, Science and Industry Minister Ed Husic denied the decision to cut the billion-dollar program was politically motivated, and said it was about making savings in the budget.

    “I understand that people won’t be fans of cutting a billion dollars of funding that was going to be directed towards their sector … But I’ve got to make calls as a minister and as part of a broader government that is trying to rein in a budget deficit.”

    We also made a definite decision around allowing the space sector to be able to access the $15 billion national reconstruction fund," he told 7.30.

    “We are scanning the sub-surface for resources, whether that’s critical minerals or water on the moon and Mars,” Mr Pearson told 7.30 from Fleet’s Adelaide workshop.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Mountaineer@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s some nuance missed here.

      The “observation program” mentioned here, was a $1.2 billion program that was announced in the last days of the previous government.
      There were no contracts, no tenders, just a vague proposal with a nebulous tax funded dollar figure attached.
      The sector as a whole was using that announcement to entice investors in their own startups.
      Now that it has been axed, the startups are struggling to gather further financing in what looks like a shaky industry.