Call of Duty bans more than 14,000 cheaters in 24 hours::undefined

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Games should make hacker servers or hacker zones where it’s free for all to change your game however you want it. I understand the fin in changing the gameplay of a game to make it new.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would love a sneaky anti cheating system, where if you are detected the game behind the scenes starts making everyone else’s shot at you 100% headshots 😂 so there you are, trying to cheat, but you can’t get a single shot off because stray bullets are just homing at your noggen!

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I love the hilarousness of the idea, but unfortunately aimbots can just auto-fire at the first pixel, while humans won’t even register that you appeared for “long” milliseconds. However, if the game can force other people’s shots at you then I guess it can also force your shots to miss.

      • 💡dim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or even better, it forces a banana suit on you, so you can carry on playing but everyone knows who you are.

    • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Some already do. You have what’s known as “cheater ques” or “cheater lobbies” where cheaters get shadowbanned to only play against other cheaters

      • wildcardology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Problem is, players reporting other players puts them along with the cheaters in the shadow ban servers. I’ve been shadow banned a number of times and it’s not fun and I don’t cheat.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not why most people use these hacks though. They don’t want to play with other hackers, they want to use the hacks to give themselves an unfair advantage against people that aren’t using hacks so they can win.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Matchmaking works best when as many people as possible are in the pool to join your match.

      Having everyone in the game on the official servers is the way to go and nobody should be modifying the game. It’s unfair.

      • maniclucky@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like the suggestion is more about harm reduction. If you can’t get the cheaters to behave, quarantine them.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather the freedom of dedicated servers, playing how we want and long after they abandoned the game or disabled matchmaking.

      • Whirlybird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Having everyone in the game on the official servers is the way to go and nobody should be modifying the game. It’s unfair.

        Remember the backlash that Microsoft got by trying to do this with UWP games?

        • Cypher
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The backlash was because of what it would’ve meant for the wider Windows ecosystem and is the reason Valve threw enormous amounts of time and money at developing Proton.

          It was actually fairly similar to what Google now want to do with browser environment integrity in terms of being anti-competitive and anti-consumer.

          • Whirlybird
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It was actually fairly similar to what Google now want to do with browser environment integrity in terms of being anti-competitive and anti-consumer.

            It wasn’t really “anti consumer” though. As a consumer you don’t have a right to modify purchased software.

            Did it suck for modders? Definitely. Are they entitled to be able to mod games that they didn’t make? No.

            I’m not sure what you think was “anti-competitive” about it either?

            The backlash was because of what it would’ve meant for the wider Windows ecosystem

            Most of the stories going around at the time of “what it meant for the wider windows ecosystem” was just FUD though. Anyone could make and install any UWP programs they wanted to. UWP wasn’t restricted to only specific companies or anything, just like existing .exes aren’t. There was so much ridiculous lies being spread at the time, it was insane.