• DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, I hear you. With an election the country is choosing between two different paths. In this case we’re either choosing progress or… not.

    One of Dutton’s talking points over the last few weeks was that he would propose some alternatives after the referendum. I imagine that will be part of the forthcoming “Albo is out of touch” campaign.

        • Whirlybird
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Almost everything I’ve seen last night and this morning was about how this wasn’t a result to do nothing and ignore it, it was a result that said go back and rethink because what you suggested wasn’t going to help.

          • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m surprised you would so easily believe what was said.

            They can’t exactly say “yes well this proves there’s no appetite to address inequality and that Australians are happy with the status quo.”

            Instead of course you get these placating which allow everyone to feel as though they’ve done the right thing while actually doing nothing at all.

            • Whirlybird
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Your last paragraph describes most of the reason why people would vote yes on such a toothless virtue signalling change.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      This wasn’t “progress or not” though, that’s ridiculous and sore loser talk. Another toothless advisory panel that will be ignored isn’t “progress”.

      Real progress would be something like guaranteeing some new seats at the senate to go with the “voice”. Give them an actual voice that gets to decide on things that affect their community. Giving them a “voice” that can and will be ignored will change nothing for the better.

      • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not another toothless advisory panel.

        It would’ve been a constitutionally supported advisory, with demonstrated will of the Australian people. That wouldn’t be so easily ignored.

        • Whirlybird
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It literally would be another toothless advisory panel because it was not going to have any power. Being constitutionally supported just means it has to exist in some unspecified form. There was no “demonstrated will of the Australian people” in it.

          You know what does have the demonstrated will of the Australian people? That the proposed voice was a bad idea. That shouldn’t be ignored.