• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    And I’m still wondering why they are still wondering. So they are digging out oversized Caligae. You know that Caligae are? They are sandals. And they are digging them up at a fort at Hadrians Wall. Up in Scotland. Where things get cold occasionally.

    Now imagine soldiers, standing guard or patrolling in the cold, wearing sandals. What would they do? They’d wrap up their feet in something warm, like lamb furs. Or cloth. But wadded up feet don’t fit into standard-sized sandals designed for bare feet. Solution, rather obvious, is having oversized sandals that fit feet and insulation.

  • josefo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Gigantic? Massive? I was expecting hilariously big sizes, turned out to be my shoe size. Wtf. Is that insane that this particular fort had conscripts that were selected just because they were taller? Other cultures have preferred taller, bulkier soldiers, why this can’t be the case?

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And I’m still wondering why they are still wondering. So they are digging out oversized Caligae. You know that Caligae are? They are sandals. And they are digging them up at a fort at Hadrians Wall. Up in Scotland. Where things get cold occasionally.

    Now imagine soldiers, standing guard or patrolling in the cold, wearing sandals. What would they do? They’d wrap up their feet in something warm, like lamb furs. Or cloth. But wadded up feet don’t fit into standard-sized sandals designed for bare feet. Solution, rather obvious, is having oversized sandals that fit feet and insulation.

  • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe it’s a gag? Romans had memes and there are a lot of beings in Roman and Greek mythology that are essentially just oversized humanoids, so maybe the shoes are tied to some sort of mythological in-joke at the fort.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe part of a psy-op?

      Spread rumours the fort is defended by giants, have your troops bring these out to leave tracks… Don’t know how feasible that would be though, both in terms of leaving tracks in places you wouldn’t be observed doing so and in terms of them being believable enough for an actual tracker to believe.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Foot size is not particularly correlated to dick size- and wouldn’t have necessarily been a boon if he were. Apparently Roman woman preferred smallish dicks. (Which is why all the Roman statues of gods were lacking by today’s standards.)

        • witchybitchy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          iirc large dicks were seen as brutish and savage by everyone, as if you had no control over your primal, animalistic urges and just wanted to fuck all the time. small pp = civilized.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The Greeks regarded big dicks as immoderate and therefore barbaric. The Romans, on the other hand, were more welcoming, though they seem to have still regarded them as comical. There are Roman statues of men with massive schwantzes. Greek sculpture depicted small winkies, unless they were showing satyrs or similar mythical monsters.

          • Kobibi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            And this is also why ‘black people have big dicks’ is a historical stereotype. Sure they have big dicks, like horses or cattle…

            And it’s a weird thing where people now think it’s a ‘positive’ stereotype

            I remember a Man U chant about a player having a big dick - anti-racism organisations called it out and the chanters were shocked. It’s a ‘positive’ thing, right?

            History is kinda weird and very racist

            • witchybitchy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              there’s a conversation to have regarding reclaiming oppressive words and ideas, but it has to be driven by those being oppressed in order to really work and be felt by society as a whole as acceptable

            • witchybitchy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              I can see it. the underlying principle is control of oneself so anything that implies otherwise was faux pas/taboo

              • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                It was also that men were seen as interacting intellectually and sexual desire was associated with women.

                I wouldn’t be surprised if it was partly due to men not being very involved in the domestic world. Like it makes sense, so much of expectations on women even today revolves around children, so a stereotype that women are horny as fuck as well makes a certain sense to include there.

                Though I’ll admit I’m thinking of Greece right now and this stereotype may have been one that didn’t spread to Rome.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I dunno, anecdotal evidence favors a correlation. Saw a great many dicks showering in gym class. Also, I’m short and women are often surprised when they whip out my hog. Seems their experience jives with mine.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I did admit my experiences were anecdotal. Just sayin’!

              None of the short guys in 8th-grade gym were sporting hog legs, but those tall guys were freaky. For that matter so were the black guys! Someone will bag on me for discussing 8th grade penile length. Let me assure the haters, it was a BIG (heh) deal to us pubescent kids. We all talked about it at great length (heh again). Perhaps more worrisome was the fear of popping a chubby in those skimpy gym shorts. How you gonna hide that?!

              Also, why have so many women been visibly surprised when they went down on my short ass? A stripper once said, “Well. That’s not what I expected.”

              Look, if your smear out studies across all homo sapiens, meh, probably not a big (heh) difference. And everything I’m scanning at the moment shows a correlation “with weak coefficients”. Not sure what coefficients means in this context, never took stats. But I can’t deny the evidence of my own eyes, even if I’m the exception to the rule. I think guys are adverse to any notion that their dick can be guessed with their clothes on.

              Maybe a better correlation? Friend who had the biggest dick I’ve even heard of was 6’8". He showed us this trick, and it seems to fit:

              Spread your thumb and forefinger out as far as they go. That’s your length. I’m a perfect match. I know. Anecdotes. Again. But again, real-life experience bears it out.

              Friend and I were having a threesome with his fiancee. He’s taller than me, and way better built. I got the longer dick, easily. We did the hand trick, perfect match. Whatever. Try it yourself!

              Now I’m going to post the finger trick and see what people self-report. Unscientific, but may be interesting!

  • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    dons foil hat
    It was for the giants. Cultures across the world have myths of giants. If any of those myths are based in reality, these big shoes could have been for the descendants of the giants that have interbred with us humans over the ages. By the time of Hadrian’s wall these part giants would have been nothing more than large humans.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean … maybe they had to keep some uniforms there for new recruits. and the biggest sandals rarely got used and got left behind when Rome abandoned the isles ?

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Or maybe they are finding raw materials. Perhaps they would make shoes as needed, and they had soles cut to a huge size so you’d be able to trim them down to whatever size was needed.

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    That shoe’s sole was 12.6 inches long, which is roughly the same size as a men’s 14 in the United States, reports Live Science’s Kristina Killgrove.

    That is smaller than my shoe size, those scientists have a dumb frame of reference.

    Not my fault everyone else has weird and tiny feet.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering 6’ people were rare 150 years ago, I’d imagine a size 14 would have been crazy 2,000 years ago.

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kind of rare, but not exactly unheard of. Kinda like anyone taller than 6’ 8" these days. If you saw them, you might think “Wow, they’re tall” but you wouldnt think of them as freakish.

        Combine that with this being a Roman fort, and the fact that being a soldier was probably a pretty common job for big/strong men, and it’s really not that surprising. Kind of a nothing story really. Imagine a bunch of future archeologists scratching their heads over finding a bunch of large shoes in an NBA locker room.

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        They also lived shorter on average. Some of them still reached a very old age. The average really doesn‘t tell us that much about the extremes that existed.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s because of high infant/childhood mortality rates skewing the average. If you take away anyone who died before age 5, the average age shoots up to like 70+ in most places. Not too different from today.

          • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes, I know. The problem is that most people see an average stat and think it‘s a universal law. That goes for life expectancy, height and even GDP per capita among other things. In reality no one is perfectly average and extremes exist everywhere.

      • ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah I work in a place that sells shoes and I can tell from the thumbnail image that shoe is much, much bigger than a size 14. Nowhere that sells normal shoes for people to actually wear will sell shoes that big.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          One of my sons wears size 14, despite not being freakishly tall (he’s 6’2" and strongly buit). He usually has to put in a special order. His hands are also massive. We’ve never had a conversation about cock size, though I’m somewhere in the normal range, whereas my wife’s dad was reputed to be a tripod, so it could go either way, or somewhere in-between.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since May, archaeologists working at Magna have unearthed eight massive leather shoes that each measure more than 11.8 inches long.

    So four pairs? Was there one gigantic dude there that kept losing his shoes?

    • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      11.8 inches is about 30 cm or size 47 in the european system. Which is big but not unheard of. I personally know 2 people wearing similar shoe sizes. Very possible it’s just one guy who kept losing shoes.

  • Mio@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    They just wanted the shoes to last. Make they quality. Many layers.