• TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think he would be relieved to get rid of Tesla if someone would buy it. The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation, and the cars they build are more expensive symbols of status than practical products. Tesla can’t compete with global EV manufacturers, that’s a Damocles sword waiting to fall.

      SpaceX is where the money is now, and all the electric innovation Tesla did can be used for something else.

      • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        The full self-driving promise was always a matter of interpretation

        There’s nothing to interpret. It does not fully drive itself.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not safely anyway.

          Fortunately for him, and unfortunately for us, he undoubtedly has full control over whichever department defines the word “safely”.

        • Flic@mstdn.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          @OutlierBlue @TeamAssimilation but it will next year, right? Let’s just ignore all those times it’s veered into the wrong lane or onto train tracks or whatever, it’s fine. Next year, next year, next year.

          And Mars in a decade.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Starship was supposed to be doing trips to mars each year by last year. Instead it has sometimes managed to not explode on a suborbital trajectory. But of course regulations are what hold it back…

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        2 days ago

        Musk is getting $8 million each day from the US government to destroy the US government. He was given $44 billion to destroy Twitter. He’s not worried about money.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nobody at Tesla headquarters voted to alienate their customer base. No board meeting decided to turn their electric car company into a political lightning rod.

    This is technically not true. The board keeps Elon Musk on as CEO of Tesla, and they granted him the biggest bonus package ever, while he was already very controversial and clearly was losing his mind, because they thought he would be able to make them money.

    • borth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re right, that’s not just technically untrue. The board voted with their wallet, by giving him even more money than ever, so he could continue doing what he is doing. The people on the board wouldn’t give a shit if only Nazis buy their cars, as long as there’s enough of them to keep buying.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well joke’s on them though, because it seems Musk has found a way to tap US citizens directly, so he probably doesn’t even care much about Tesla anymore now that it is failing.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It is mental that a man worth billions in mostly electric car companyv shares is courting people who would run their cars on coal if they could.

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Will he really need customers much longer? I mean it seems like he can just have any government agency replace their fleet with his trash in the name of “efficiency”.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Elon has always been a terrible person, but he was once focused on things that society actually needed, like electrifying transportation to avoid climate collapse.

      He seems to have gone sharply downhill into total insanity by taking ketamine while locking himself in a rightwing echo chamber. It’s the perfect storm of dissociating from reality.

      • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        Elon has always been a terrible person

        The problem with Elon is he’s been provably an idiot for the past 25 years.

        The first thing I ever heard about Musky is that back in 2000-ish he wanted PayPal to take their infra, throw out all the Linux/BSD in use, and move everything to Windows NT.

        Anyone who was even remotely IT adjacent in that era can come along and tell you how utterly moronic that idea is.

        Anytime I’ve ever heard him blather on about some stupid shit that doesn’t exist except in his delusions or talk about, well, ANYTHING technical or specialized all I was ever able to think of is that he got lucky that Thiel didn’t drain all of his blood and leave his corpse in a ditch.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          From a musk pov it’s 100% logical. Money.

          Why? Win2k was quite stable. Stable enough to use it in warships.

          Linux/Bsd is not free. When you use it in your company you want pro support. That support comes free with windows enterprise licenses. So the cost difference there is almost non existent. And, MS being M$, they would’ve sweetened the deal. A lot. Just think of the marketing worth of this deal for MS.

          And lastly: Who is cheaper? A good linux admin or a windows guy?

          So 90% of the stability at 50% of the cost. That’s not a bad deal.

      • Flatfire@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        2 days ago

        Potential ketamine addiction aside, he’s just gravitated toward where he sees more money and unfluence for himself. He wanted the prestige of being a leader in tech, so he used his influence and money to build SpaceX. Then he bullied his way into the ownership of Tesla, desperately wanting to appear as a genius to libertarian and liberal minds alike, but he’s never been any less of an authoritarian. When Trump rose to power the first time, he sat and watched and along with the rest of the Silicon Valley Moguls, he began to move himself into positions of influence with populist politicians, borrowing the evangelical right’s playbooks and throwing himself into the spotlight no matter the reason. He pivoted off his falsified image as some kind of American self-starter into MAGA rhetoric.

        Musk doesn’t have lofty ideals or any real focus on the betterment of society. I don’t think he ever did. He just wanted to be a real life Tony Stark and command the influence that came with it. Now he doesn’t need to, because he’s got Trump in his back pocket and is mostly untouchable by any normal means.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Dr Dorothy Bishop resigned from the Royal Society back in November 2024 because of Musk. Everybody knew. And being an FRS is a huge, huge deal to a British scientist.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not as big a deal as virtue signaling to that particular British scientist, naturally, but it’s quite important to the other ones I’m sure.

        • daddy32@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Of course the fascists invented a dismissive phrase to label anyone objecting against them.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They’ve probably had more recalls on the cyber truck than they’ve had sales of the cyber truck

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Remember 2015? A Tesla parked in your driveway told your neighbours that you valued innovation, that you possessed an environmental conscience, that you had a stake in the future of the planet. The cars weren’t perfect, but they meant something. They represented hope - for clean energy, EVs, and a world beyond fossil fuels.

    This was me years go. I knew climate change was real and an imminent threat. I wanted to vote with my wallet for a cleaner future. I also wanted to strike a blow against the National Automotive Dealers Association for their regressive practices that hurt consumers and drive prices for cars higher for everyone. Buying a Tesla did those things. I charge the car on sunlight from my house. I don’t have to support the petroleum industry’s damage to environment and people around the world. I was proud to be doing something rather than just talking about needs for changes against climate change.

    Musk doesn’t get any of my money from this car. I don’t pay for any of the Tesla monthly services. I’m don’t want to be seen driving with a Tesla logo on the car. I’m ashamed that my good intentions funded a fascist.

    • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is no shame in your ownership of the vehicle based on your intentions; I would humbly assert that anger is a more appropriate reaction to the current leadership of the company that made it. If strangers judge you, that’s on them.

      If I had had the means to purchase one 10+ years ago, I would have. Most people who claim they wouldn’t are not being honest with themselves or disapproved of the virtue signaling associated with them at the time.

      • margaritox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yea, when Teslas first started appearing, I loved their whole philosophy and really wanted one.

    • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I came really close back then, had a deposit but canceled due to realizing I had a perfectly good old car and didn’t “need” one at the time. Hindsight says I lucked out.

      If I did get it, and still had it (I would, I keep cars for 10+ years), I would probably rebadge it as an indicator of my dislike for what the brand has become.

      I’d actually love to see a rebadging campaign by dissatisfied owners.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Maybe it’s time to get better at researching companies before major decisions. Do you have a system in place for doing background research on future large purchases?

      That shame is no use unless it helps you update your behavior. Shame about a “one-off” decision in the past will continue to nag you until you figure out how to avoid the same mistake in the future.

      So how can you avoid realizing ten years out that some big purchase you made supported someone you disagree with? How can you do it in advance?

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        When you can predict the behavior of a company 10 years out, you pet me know. I’ll make you my banker.

        Until then, that whole comment is hot garbage.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Don’t be a dick. No one’s going around investigating the corporate culture of every parent corporation that they buy their product from because they’d be at it all damn day.

        Did you even watch The Good Place that’s the whole point of the show, you can’t be a “good” person based on absolute morals, because it’s impossible in the 21st century as the world is too complicated.

  • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Tesla might have to go on welfare… by having the US government buy thousands upon thousands of Teslas. 🤮

  • Horsey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Everyone forgets where the German cars, Henry Ford, etc came from politically.

    I was looking into my first EV, and politics just didn’t weigh that much into the decision. Now, the “infotainment as a perpetual service”, that turned me off and away from Tesla. With CarPlay my car dash will never lose service, and will always be free to use with updates from Apple/Google. I can’t imagine why people would ever pay for their infotainment when CarPlay is better or equal in all cases to the alternative.

    That said, if Tesla and other brands were equally weighted in my purchase decision, I’d then happily rule Tesla out based on merit.

    • skeesx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      German cars come from Carl Benz, who built the first automobile in 1885, four years before Hitlers birth.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Not necessarily Carl Benz himself, but it has been litigated that the company had ties to the nazi regime. I’m not arguing that Mercedes was founded on Nazi values, I’m just saying there was a connection and a less than stellar history of bedfellows.

        • skeesx@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Every German corporation that was around back then had ties to the Nazis, especially anything industrial. As one can see in the US at the moment, corporations swim with the tide. Most of these companies succeeded despite the Nazis, not because of them, with obvious exception being VW.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Dotard Musk comes from a South African Afrikaner background. Those same people literally ran a white supremist government and jailed Nelson Mandela for decades.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      Are either Ford or Mercedes currently run by Nazis? Can the average person on the street name the CEO of either of them?

      The problem with Tesla is that everyone hates the guy who has made himself the face of the company at a time when there are plenty of alternatives.

      • Horsey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The issue is that the alternatives generally aren’t that much better in a vacuum. Infotainment vs Tesla infotainment (removing the CarPlay merits): It’s not even close. Tesla is like 10-15 years ahead of everything else on the US market in their price range. Car manufacturers famously lock in their tech and designs something like 3 years before public release.

        Will there be meaningful software updates for your Kia EV6 in 2028? Absolutely not, no way.

        Do you want to tow anything more than 1000Kg? Good luck outside of Tesla.

        NACS? Not one single other car available yet.

        Do you want a dashcam? Rivian is the only other brand, IIRC.

        I’m not apologizing for Tesla, but it’s really painful how awful all other cars are compared to the competition.

        • rusticus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          If Rivian had a more affordable option they’d be eating Teslas lunch right now. R2 coming next year.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Rivian don’t sell vehicles outside the US though so they’re always going to be on the back burner internationally. Plus of course, most of the world don’t want a pick up truck style vehicle in any case.

          • Horsey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Issue with waiting for the R2/3 is that the tax credits will probably be gone by then.

        • btaf45@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Will there be meaningful software updates for your Kia EV6 in 2028? Absolutely not, no way.

          I just got a new electric Kia and I don’t give the slightest shit about updates. In fact I would prefer no updates for fear it would make the great car I have worse. And no way in hell will I ever give Dotard Musk any of my money,

        • j4yt33@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          What an annoying position to be in, needing software updates for your fucking car. Then what, you’ll have to replace it after three years because it won’t get any new security patches anymore?

        • Ronno@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Tesla was ahead 10-15 years, sure. But they mostly lost that lead. Yes, their software is great, but at the same time Tesla doesn’t seem to be able to do basic car features right. For instance, it doesn’t have a rain sensor and relies on the front facing camera to detect rain. I can tell you from experience that it doesn’t work as well as a sensor. It’s even worse when it detects rain, while it is completely dry. But you cannot turn the wipers off, because then you won’t be able to use cruise control anymore. Cruise control, which by the way (non FSD) is shit in comparison to the competition.

          The tablet might be a couple years ahead of the competition. The value they bring in bang for buck with a great feature package is also greatly competitive. But the car is behind when it comes to just normal car things. I have buttons on my steering wheel as indicators for fuck sake, a problem we already fixed when we were still prosecuting Nazis.

    • OwlHamster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That is an insane take to me. Elon Musk is Nazi scum and the Tesla has issues, but the infotainment system is the best you can get in any car and the main reason I haven’t been able to get rid of it, ignoring the fact that literally every other non Chinese EV in the same price range in my country is objectively worse specced.

      Having an extremely responsive map with satellite imagery that boots up instantly is already better than every other car out there, but it also has built-in dashcam and livestream functionality for all 4 cameras, which is a bitch to install in other cars, and it’s already saved me a bunch of times.

      Android Auto just plain sucks ass, disconnects constantly and a lot of newer models still require a wired connection.

      Also worth noting you’re not paying for the infotainment, you’re paying for the cellular connection, with whatever local cellular company they are working with. In my case it’s cheaper than getting a data plan directly from the cellular company and my old Hyundai didn’t even have that option in my country.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well VW is still around. Maybe Teslas will be classic cars in 80 years.

    /s: They will all self immolate.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      VWs never randomly caught fire. And also they don’t look like if Transformers could somehow breed, but had an abortion.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        This.

        And VWs were survivors, crossing the desert under air cooling and repairable usually with a pair of pliers and a screwdriver. The rear bumper can hold a grown man perched back there manually pulling the throttle if you bust the linkage … or, so I … hear.

        I worry Teslas wouldn’t survive long enough to become classics. They don’t seem to be survivors.

        /63+71+71super here.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I checked on where Edsel prices have gone. They mostly match inflation. Not a worthwhile investment as a car that people are interested in decades later because it’s an infamous failure.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Musk chased right-wing approval, but the only thing he got was declining sales and a dying brand.

    I mean he got tens of billions of dollars in increased wealth so I dunno if I’d say that.

  • eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    8% drop in car sales isn’t great but I think the article is overselling the idea that the company is straight up dying. (Sadly) Most people just don’t make a connection between how they spend their money and the politics of the people they prop up.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Tesla is definitely dying unless they can turn this around quickly.
      Surplus capacity is expensive, and I bet they are already operating at a loss. And turning around a bad reputation is hard.
      Their models are dated, the cheap Tesla is cancelled, the Cybertruck is a catastrophic fiasco, and the model Y has already lost a lot of popularity, so even a new mode already said to be mostly a facelift, is unlikely to make a huge difference.
      The drop in sales in January in EU is 50%, and they are losing market share in China and USA too. So I think the actual drop is higher now than 8%.
      Note that for Nissan a 5% drop last year was called catastrophic!! And their survival is also questioned, and they are way bigger than Tesla.

      • markstos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        To your list add that new Tesla sales are also competing against an increasing number of Tesla owners who now want to divest themselves of the brand.

        More used Teslas on the market will only push down the market rates and thus profits of new Teslas even further.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Plus of course people are more likely to be trying to buy used cars (of any brand) or not buying any cars at all given the current economic situation. Which of course is also elon’s fault, at least partly.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Good point, the article states a Tesla that only had 10k miles on it, had dropped in value by about 40%!!
          With such low mileage cars on the used market so cheap, Tesla will absolutely be competing against their own used cars.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s close to 50% drop in Europe. The EU has 500 million people. They may not know it yet but Tesla is on hospice care.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Plus of course if the US ever does impose import fees on Europe the obvious response would be to impose import fees on Tesla’s. It’s a luxury item so the general public probably won’t hugely care, and it will hit the only person really to blame for all of this without unnecessarily targeting other US businesses. You know, how import fees are supposed to be used