I don’t expect this to play particularly well here, and maybe I’m just being conspiratorial, but here goes:

I banned [email protected] from [email protected] earlier today- he literally posted a matt walsh youtube link and was being otherwise transphobic in a space where that gets you banned. (link)

one of jordanlunds removed comments w/ matt walsh video:

spoiler

the reason I put down was ‘trolling about neopronouns’ I stand by that, it was violating instance rules and was unacceptable behavior from a moderator of another instance.

Shortly after that I got banned from [email protected] for ‘trolling’. To be clear, jordanlund does not moderate [email protected], but the timing struck me as an odd coincidence.

The .world thread in question (link)

I was expressing my actual opinion/position on this, if anything the post I was replying to should be considered a rule 1 violation implying leftists are russian/under russian sway:

spoiler

The removed comments that I was banned (permanent) for were just me being earnest about my position, which you’re welcome to disagree with.

I don’t view protecting my rights as something worth sacrificing other people for, even if they’re on the other side of the planet. You can be mad at me or hate me for that, but I’m not trolling.

People replying felt it was reasonable to call me an idiot for example, yet another example of selective moderation. on .world.

I don’t have any conclusive proof that my banning Jordanlund and then getting banned are related other than the suspicious timing, I welcome clarification.

Anyway in the interest of neutrality and transparency I submit both my ban and jordanlunds for review.

update

  • enkers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I used to think neo-pronouns are kinda silly, and I guess I still kinda do. But there’s no skin off my back to address people in a way that they don’t find hurtful. If people tell me my actions are hurtful to them, I try and take them at face value so long as doing so wouldn’t be hurtful to others or myself. Seems like basic conscientiousness to me.

    PTB. You did nothing wrong here.

    • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      My beef with neo pronouns is they are used in such a way to weaponize the “political correctness” attitude of some liberal communities

      Drag is a good example because they’re a blatant troll, and pretty blatantly try to get anyone who disagrees with them about anything banned for being “transphobic”

      Like it’s an obvious bit, it makes the mods and admins look like fools. Drag got banned from hexbear AND .ml for this behavior.

      • Loss@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s better to live with a few trolls than intentionally make users feel unsafe.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s the reason they got banned that’s important, both .ml and hexbear are pretty lgbtq inclusive, and they love a good troll. But they wouldn’t tolerate drag.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Every other instance should defederate from .world. Neoliberal fascism is no better than regular fascism.

        • somename [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I think we’re talking past each other or something. I was meaning that LemmyWorld is a shitty, reddit style, censorship regime. Not that neolibs getting banned is bad.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      The issue they control some key subs, but yeah I think there is enough evidence that mods on key subs are malicious actors that are working against the fedi thesis

    • wick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Since when are they neoliberal? I encounter more bleeding heart progressives on that instance than anywhere else. Sorry they don’t pass your purity test but they sure as fuck hate fascists.

      Edit: ohhhh haha, I just checked your instance. Yea no wonder they aren’t leftie enough for you, go home tankie 👋

            • wick@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              29 days ago

              I think you do, you want peoples disgust of you to be dismissed as irrational. But it has nothing to do with “red scare”, it’s just that you are really, really gross.

              • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                29 days ago

                Yeah it’s pretty disgusting to write such a comment about me specifically apparently. Everyone to the left of Biden is a commie and that equals a tankie. /s You sir are blocked.

                • wick@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Well no, there’s a lot of decent non-tanky positions left of biden, but you definitely are one. It’s a pretty unique perspective that liberals are fascists, you only hear something that dumb from the tips of the horseshoe.

  • _cryptagion @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there? They cooperate with one another, so if you cross one you cross both.

    But yeah, doesn’t surprise me. Jordan is the same white dude who said he didn’t support BLM because protests inconvenienced him. He’s a peak liberal Zionist.

    • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Jordan is the same white dude who said he didn’t support BLM because protests inconvenienced him. He’s a peak liberal Zionist.

      That stuff was wild

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there?

      One will bait, then other will ban to maintain the image of propriety

    • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      Isn’t FlyingSquid a mod there

      He was, but if I remember correctly, he had a huge mental breakdown and threatened to commit suicide over zoom, and I think they removed him until he starts feeling better. It was a big deal a few days ago.

  • WrittenInRed [any]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    I hate how quick world is to mass downvote, accuse of being a russian troll, or just straight up remove comments from people who express any sort of actual left-wing opinion. Reading through that whole comment thread there was nothing you said that came across as trolling. Its kinda exhausting how many people take any criticism of the democratic party as being support for Trump, or believe voting is the most important and only way to change anything. I get closer to just blocking world entirely every day tbh.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      .world thinks if you give reasoned arguments, reputable sources, and have a logical criticism of a liberal, you’re actually just a Russian bot, China shill, trump stan, or whatever it is this week.

      Being morally consistent is a negative to them and must be punished.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I get closer to just blocking world entirely every day tbh.

      Most of my blocklist is .world members, some shitjustworks, some hexbear, some .ml. And then there’s some members from a libertarian instance I never remember.

      It doesn’t help that .world is the biggest one, but it feels every single smug asshole who wants to put you on their “internet arguments won comp #13” collection is from .world

    • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      Its kinda exhausting how many people take any criticism of the democratic party as being support for Trump,

      Exactly!

    • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      I hate how quick world is to mass downvote, accuse of being a russian troll, or just straight up remove comments from people who express any sort of actual left-wing opinion

      They’ll actually form packs of downvoters to team up and track you to downvote. I’d get downvoted in .world, then every single post after that, even my non-political/non-controversial ones would get massively downvoted.

      One guy even wrote a program tracking me, then publicly offered it to others to track and downvote me. (thanks @[email protected])

      All because I voted third party in the election!! lolololol

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        28 days ago

        Please don’t do this. You pinged this person here who immediately went all over the thread arguing with people and escalating discussions.

        • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          I actually chuckled when I saw this because I have had you tagged as “UM obsessed”. You guys are a cute couple!

          • pooperNickel@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            30 days ago

            I’m doesn’t matter anymore. Across the world, trump simps like UM were shielded and the propaganda did its job. And now we’re fucked. Enjoy your chuckle about it

  • JonsJava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I was the one that submitted the ban, after a number of reports. On the face of it (I am at work, so don’t always have time to deep dive), The reports did seem to align with trolling.

    I had/have no idea what’s going on withe the Jordan Lund thing.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I just want to add that it seems to me that about 90% of people accused of trolling on here do not themselves think they are trolling. Something to ponder.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think this is a related factor but not quite what I’m getting at here.

        My understanding of trolling is that it is a deliberate attempt to trigger negative emotional responses and cause trouble. So users should have a good sense of whether they are or are not engaged in trolling.

        So either:

        A: They are lying about their intentions. B: The community and mods are ascribing ill intentions where there are none. Or C: Different people are using conflicting definitions of trolling.

        While A might seem the obvious answer, I think it’s actually far less common than people think. When I go through the histories of people accused of trolling I rarely see clear evidence of it. It’s usually just a person who has a tendency to respond angrily to people they disagree with, or who has a particularly strong disagreement with the community on a particular issue that they feel passionately about.

        So I usually chock these cases up to B, and I think this case is a pretty clear example. However I’d also be curious to know if C is at play here, so if you think there is another definition of trolling that differs from mine, please share it.

        • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, further looking and it’s almost certainly B. I think people like to ascribe ill-intent when they just knee-jerk to disagreement. “Trolling” here was absolutely the wrong choice of verbiage.

        • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’d hope that anyone online enough to become a Lemmy moderator would know better, but plenty of people think trolling means doing absolutely anything anyone might not be entirely happy with online. That definition seems to be the prevailing one on TV and radio news, so people who don’t engage with online culture would pick it up that way. That would cover things like posting a joke which was poorly received, whether it was just terrible or because it was offensive, and whether or not you knew it was potentially offensive.

          There’s also the matter of whether trolling is trying to intentionally provoke people specifically by pretending to be an idiot (and looking at Wikipedia, it’s sometimes as an attempt at humour rather than to provoke - e.g. Ken M isn’t trying to upset anyone, but is pretending to be an idiot or misinformed).

          So there are plenty of definitions of trolling going around, and it’s plausible that moderators might sometimes use one that’s wildly incompatible with your definition.

    • Universal Monk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      Exactly! And it seems to me the point of being a “troll” is knowing you are trolling. Doing it on purpose. But if you don’t think you’re a troll, then you aren’t actually trolling.

      Lemmy has a hard time understanding that, so on .world “troll” means “you have disagreed with me and now I’m gonna follow you around and downvote whatever you say and ask for you to be banned.”

  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I know Matt Walsh is a complete and utter tool, but what was the video Jordan linked (url doesn’t work when I copy it)? Just wondering about the context. I do think drag is probably a troll, but I understand Ada’s position and I don’t think there’s a point to arguing over it anymore, especially whilst on blahaj.

    I don’t find your comments in news to be trolling at all.

    • Squorlple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Here’s the YouTube video that was linked. Essentially another person using neopronouns in a similar manner followed by Walsh failing to find the grammar to articulate a snarky comment about grammar.

      https://youtube.com/shorts/_ymEiWyyl4A

      OP’s link doesn’t work for me either so I copied it from the screenshot. My phone also had trouble copying from the screenshot since it read the lowercase L “l” as a vertical bar “|”.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think neopronouns defeat the purpose of pronouns as when they become bespoke like this they cease being linguistic shortcuts but I also think calling people mentally ill for expressing themselves doesn’t do anyone any good either.

          • psud
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            I don’t think people are really seeking a bespoke pronoun set, it’s more like several sets of candidate pronouns fighting to become mainstream. I used to prefer neopronouns for myself, but I never minded if someone used a different gender neutral pronoun for me

            I was especially chuffed when someone referred to me as “xe” on a service I’d never talked about pronouns on

            Ed. Just watched the video. I don’t like the chances of the demon set winning, people using the distinctly odd are seeking bespoke pronouns, which aren’t very useful

  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Really unsurprising considering it involved Israel. News mods usually bend over backwards like the r/worldnews to remove anything slightly critical. Especially when it’s calling out hasbara

  • FrostyTrichs@walledgarden.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 month ago

    If we’re assuming it was a retaliation ban- The powers that be at lemmy.world would be wise to nip this type of thing in the bud now and replace those actively working to deceive and lash out at others from their team.

    Eventually people will stop giving the owners/admins the benefit of the doubt when controversial things like this happen. What happens then? The time/money/resources are being thrown away to enable a few people’s egos and eventually the users will tire of it and abandon ship. It seems like we’re drawing closer to that every day.

    One way or another the true colors will always come out. Interesting times ahead.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Banning people because they just tell exactly what is happening 🤦🏻

      Go live in trumps ass, lol

      This jordanlund seems to be the rare kind of human I hate… (I generally love other people🤭)

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    World is an absolute cancer on Lemmy, its filled with ShitLibs who hold on to their Reddit mentality. If Blahaj defederated from world absolutely nothing of value would be lost.

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jordanlund is petty lil bitch so this checks out purely from trust me bro angle << debunked

    But at the same time, if y’all are banning each other, y’all kinda deserve each other.

    Matt walsh is feces tho, no doubt.