• phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 days ago

    US should follow Europe’s regulatory model - “prove it’s safe before you sell it.” US model is “sell it until someone proves it’s unsafe.”

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Remember when they tested on animals? Now it’s tested on humans.

      They thought there was some third option.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    The US Food and Drug Administration has said it’s taking the issue seriously

    And yet, it keeps happening. The Hux family from this story had to sue the manufacturer to get anything. So many people were harmed and probably never even got informed about the recall. Plenty of other harmful products will injure people and go undetected.

    The FDA has no teeth, and it’s not getting any better in the next 4 years.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      What, you mean the brain worm that directs RFK’s actions isn’t capable of effective regulation?

      Certainly it won’t be the case that a random doctor from Arkansas who happens to be a Fox News contributor and also happens to shill her own vitamin supplement mix will be executing directives from the brain worm.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        From the article:

        It’s unclear whether that will change under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee to run the US Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy has called for getting rid of dyes and other ingredients linked to cancer that can be found in food and has said the US needs tougher regulators that aren’t as close to the industries they police.

        I guess even a broken clock is right twice a day … hopefully he makes that happens.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    But an internal FDA document showed the agency classified the benzene levels in Johnson & Johnson sunscreens as “life threatening.” The agency didn’t share that information with consumers at the time. The document came to light through a public records request.

    Federal law doesn’t give the agency power to force a recall. Instead, companies use their own discretion to decide when to pull contaminated products off shelves.

    After Valisure discovered benzene in widely used benzoyl peroxide acne products like Proactiv and Clearasil in March, the FDA and consumer-goods makers said the lab didn’t test the products in real-world conditions. Valisure has said its testing meets international standards and it gets its test results checked by another lab.

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Where is all the benzene coming from? It’s not an actual ingredient in these products.

      • Is it purposeful adulteration?
      • A byproduct of another ingredient breaking down into benzene?
      • Something used to clean the manufacturing or packaging equipment?
      • credo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It seems like a stretch to ask people to try reading the article, but it’s in the second paragraph:

        They had no way of knowing the gas, derived from fossil fuel, wasn’t properly purified and contaminated the sunscreen with benzene

        • reddig33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Thanks. Last two times I’d read about this the articles didn’t include any info about where the benzene was coming from. I guess they finally figured it out. Neutragena had a recall last time this happened. And know that I’ve read the article I can see that’s mentioned too.

  • 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What the fuck is this garbage ass website? I have to agree to the terms and conditions in order to READ an article? Fuck off with that bullshit.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Love how the law lets the private company making the profits decide when a product should be pulled off shelves. Defintely no conflict of interests there.

      • Reality_Suit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        There’s no incentive for them to even self regulate. They just need to not get caught, and if they’re the one regulating themselves, all they have to do is not catch themselves doing anything wrong.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Generally no, unless it’s a pharmaceutical. Drugs require approval, everything else, including all kinds of “dietary supplements”, do not.