Let’s face it, the dems don’t care about the commoners, the republicans are actually pure evil, everyone was happy when that shitstain CEO got shot.

Maybe we should build on this momentum we have to drive actual change at the political level.

my first act as president in 2029 would be to issue a full and unconditional pardon of the billionaire killer.

edit:

well alrighty then, followup question, does anyone want to join my newly formed political party? I’m going to start working on drafting our mission statement, or manifesto or whatever it should be called.

Further Edit: I set up a lemmy community for us to post shit about it. If you want to join, that’s our official, unofficial space. https://lemmy.world/c/newpoliticalparty

  • Zomg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Since you seem interested, start one. Don’t ask someone to do it for you, or for their approval. Do what you truly believe, not what others support.

  • FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you do. I think it’s a great idea.

    But don’t fall into the “green party” loophole of just sabotaging neo-liberal democrats and helping literal facists get elected.

    Start local. Run for seats you can win. Priosritise states with open primary systems.

    We need a grassroots movement.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Right now is actually the perfect time to create a third party. You have effectively two years to get people excited about an actual progressive party and if the DNC come knocking saying you’re going to split the vote, tell them that they are splitting the vote and they should fold into you.

      I’m fucking tired of the Democrats learning the wrong lessons from lost elections. They’d rather lose than give up power.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          There is a reason why it worked for the Republicans and won’t work for the Democrats: the bases are vastly different.

          Republicans, by in large, will vote for a Republican even if they don’t like the candidate. I saw this a lot when I was a poll worker. They don’t even care about their platform. So long as they have an R at the end of their name, they get a vote from Republicans.

          While Democrats vote Democrat, they’ll only come out to vote if they are energized. They won’t come out to vote if they don’t feel like you’ve earned it. We saw this in 2016 and 2024.

          Simply put, Republicans are more reliable voters.

          The Democrat tent is very large with often conflicting values. A lot of single-issue voters will simply stay home than to vote for a Democrat. Because of this, it is rare when a candidate will arise that will galvanize and coalesce the base.

          The last time it happened was Obama.

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Doesn’t even have to be progressive per se, just an “Eat The Elites” party would probably do well as the one and only platform at this point.

  • maplebar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Until we have a voting system where 3rd parties are viable (for example. Ranked Choice Voting, Star Voting, Approval Voting, etc.), we absolutely do not benefit in any way for the existence of more parties.

    Whether intentional or not, America today is a two-party system by design. If you want more choices beyond the Democrats and Republicans, you need to help us enact voting system reforms which are necessary to allow 3rd parties to exist legitimately. We aren’t joking when we say that voting 3rd party is throwing your vote away; it very much is.

  • shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 days ago

    Y’all need an actual left of center, worker based party to undo this late stage capitalist nightmare that’s happening now

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Need to fix the broken FPTP voting system first. Otherwise any left leaning political party will just take votes away from the dems and hand the election to the republicans.

    And Republicans know this by the way, any left leaning fringe party will get financial donations from the Republican Party,

  • Curious Canid@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think we’re going to gain any traction until we override Citizens United and make bribing public officials illegal again. That would allow us to take back the legislative process and begin passing bills that the super rich are not going to like.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    First past the post is what you’re tangling with.

    https://youtu.be/s7tWHJfhiyo

    It makes it so third parties only hurt their closest friend and lose to their least favorite party. Taking that energy into the democratic party itself is probably the best bet. Not good, but best.

    In ranked choice, yes a new party would probably be best.

  • SadSadSatellite @lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    First order: Greed Crimes

    Any white collar crime done for the sole benefit of enriching one or siphoning money away from citizens or workers.

    Regulatory capture, pyramid schemes, political bribery, hidden tax havens, environmental distruction, writing bills like citizens united, cutting social services, forming monopolies, competition buyouts, blatant conflicts of interest, etc.

    We have hate crimes, when something is done out of hatred for a people it is given the harshest penalty because it hurts an entire group.

    The thing is, greed crimes ruin the lives of thousands and millions, possibly everyone, and in my opinion should be capital offenses.

    We need an investigative oversight committee that stop all functions of a person or company while looking into accusations. If found guilty, a company is dismantled, an individual is executed, their will is ignored and all assets are liquidated and used to remedy the situation that was created.

    If found not guilty, you’re closely monitored by the greed crime committee for an agreed period. If you are accused of three sepparate greed crimes and different times, even if found not guilty, you should be considered a bad faith potential, and exiled or removed from any position of power.

    • problematicPanther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That’s something Vietnam got right, sentence the corrupt billionaires to death. their greed destroys lives and kills countless people, yet we do nothing to fight back. screw that. It’s time to fight back now.

  • blazera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    To everyone bringing up FPTP, other countries manage to not have it, it can be done, so stop fighting so hard against efforts to doing away with it.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No, because “caring about commoners” and “shitting on the rich” are not actually the same objective. People are happy about it because it feels good to get revenge or for people who treat others unfairly to be punished, but sating popular bloodthirst isn’t necessarily aligned with actually making society a better place. “Kill the bad people and the problems will be fixed” is historically very much a famous last words kind of sentiment.

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Since the democratic party has become arguably centered instead of left, its natural that a new left leaning party should become mainstream

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    No. Socialists of the past have never won any political victories by saying “rich bad,” the victory comes from presenting alternative solutions like public ownership and central planning. What you are describing is adventurism, not a genuine revolutionary movement.

    I suggest you read my intro to Marxism list.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            No. This platform is “rich bad.” It doesn’t present an alternative, it preserves existing systems that give rise to wealth disparity without tackling them and presenting an alternative.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                People have already hammered out those details, the most major arguments are on the basis of Anarchism or Marxism. OP didn’t invent anything, the answer lies in the past. PSL already exists, as does FRSO, what specifically is wrong with these where an entirely new party is necessary?

    • problematicPanther@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I didn’t actually say socialism though, did I? I mean, I’m a socialist, but I think we have to just focus on shitting on the rich, because it’s easy and people will be able to join in.

      I’m also not ruling out throwing actual shit at the rich.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If your only platform is uniting on hatred, and have no actual plans in place for improvement, you just become terrorists, rather than revolutionaries. Something being “easy” doesn’t mean it is effective. Lenin actually wrote about such a group, the Socialist Revolutionaries, in the article Revolutionary Adventurism. The SRs had taken to advocating assassination as it “transfers power from the elites to the masses” (something historically false) and declared that theory was bad, because it can get in the way of unity. Such directionless action ultimately doesn’t change anything.

        Hating the Capitalists is well and good, but without a unified plan to replace them, the hate becomes the goal and nothing gets better. That’s why we can celebrate the death of this bozo while recognizing nothing will change because of it unless the workers get organized.

    • Toga77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean the French revolution would like a word with you.

      Also rich bad. It’s demonstrably true that rich people are completely disconnected from reality and will step on anyone to maintain their wealth.

      It is not all of them, but it is most of them. History has always seen class warfare and this time is not different .

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The French Revolution was a bourgeois revolution. It deposed the monarchy, but unlike what the Paris Commune tried to achieve, the Bourgeoisie became the new owners of the State. Proletarian Revolution needs organization and unity.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    We don’t need a party devoted to shitting on any specific other group. We need one that is devoted to building up regular, every day people instead of the already obscenely wealthy. Like, actually devoted to that and not simply giving lip service to it while working against it (like Conservatives tend to do), or doing as little as they can to get “good guy points” while still sucking a big, fat corporate dick (like the Democrats tend to do).