• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m over pointing fingers and playing holy than thou.

    The people who plan to build a Hungarian-style autocratic government are in power now, and they’re hoping the left is exhausted and tired of fighting this shit for a decade.

    This shit is going to be dangerous, and we’re going to have to motivate people to push back hard than even. Pointing fingers just divides us and makes us even weaker.

    • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      That’s a bummer because progressives couldn’t be bothered to stop an erasure of minorities and lgbt alongside a subjugation of women.

      Quite simply, either you align with them or you can get fucked.

      At least that’s how it’s currently playing out.

        • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          “But mom! I got a gun for self defense, how was i supposed to know that you’d be declared property even though they were screaming it at the top of their lungs?”

          • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Its awesome that my post got removed because they can’t admit that they were DEAD WRONG TO HAVE BEEN CENSORING THOSE CALLING FOR ARMING UP FOR SELF-DEFENSE.

            FUCK YOU, MODS

        • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Shortsighted progressives decided that people they dont know halfway around the world were more important than their friends and family.

          Hope you can tell your wife/ girlfriend /sister you had the moral high ground when she’s declared property.

  • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Leftist here. I voted for Kamala. All the leftist media I consumed argued for voting for Kamala. All the leftists I knew vote for Kamala.

    What are you talking about?

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      Leftists are so insignificant that we don’t need to make any concessions to them but so powerful that they are responsible for any Democratic loss.

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Leftists are just about the only group that will go around saying they “won’t vote” if there isn’t a candidate making enough concessions to them. Leftists are a small group but they are enough they could sway an election if they came out and made their voices heard by voting instead of just holding signs and yelling. But getting that to happen isn’t as simple as just saying you’re against the genocide, because Harris did that and it wasn’t enough. It isn’t as simple as supporting unions, because she did that and it wasn’t enough. It isn’t as simple as supporting rights for women, minorities, and LGBTQ, because she did that and it wasn’t enough.

        The right isn’t stupid enough to believe that they can get their oligarchy without winning elections, but belief in incremental change is fundamentally incompatible with a lot of leftist ideology.

        • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Democrats spend far too much time and energy pretending everyone to the left of the Democrats are anti-electoralist anarchists.

          getting that to happen isn’t as simple as just saying you’re against the genocide, because Harris did that and it wasn’t enough. It isn’t as simple as supporting unions, because she did that and it wasn’t enough. It isn’t as simple as supporting rights for women, minorities, and LGBTQ, because she did that and it wasn’t enough.

          Yes. You’re absolutely correct that what the Democrats are doing is not enough. If the DNC can get that through their thick skulls, maybe we have a chance next time.

          You can’t just say you support unions.

          You can’t just say you’re against genocide.

          You have to make people’s lives materially better, and until the Dems choose to do that, we’re in trouble.

    • Belgdore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      There were a few people on the left (with followings on social media) advocating for third party votes because Kamala wouldn’t say that she was going to stop sending money to Israel.

      Post election, it looks like third party votes didn’t spoil anything.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh yeah, I was arguing with them all the time. I figured they were bots. Seems like they have all dried up right after the election.

        • syreus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          (Most) Third party voters are like cicadas. They spend the majority of their lives immature and underground. Every 4 years they swarm and die quickly to apathy and despair.

          Just like cicadas, third party voters will be heavily affected by climate change.

    • minnow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      7 days ago

      The Democrats could have run a turd as a candidate with the slogan “it’ll be a shit show” and I’d still have voted for them with no regrets, because I understand that fascism is an existential threat. If the Democrats are to blame in any way, it’s because they didn’t try to get people to understand that OH WAIT THEY DID.

      Should the Democrats have run a better candidate and a better campaign? Obviously yes. Is it their fault that voters were willing to let a fascist win? Not even a little.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Guess what, not everyone thinks that, and a good politician would actually promise to improve people’s lives instead of continually talking about how bad the other guy is.

        Trotting out the least popular Republicans ever as being on your side didn’t help either.

        • minnow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 days ago

          not everyone thinks that

          Yes, obviously not everyone thinks fascism is an existential threat. Which is probably one of our greatest failures as a society, in terms of education.

          • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            If the democrat party genuinely gave a shit they would of held a primary and nominated a qualified and popular candidate. They didn’t. They don’t care!

          • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I think it’s more “a lot of people would really like someone to significantly change the system of politics, and Trump promised to be a wrecking ball… oh and btw… wtf do you mean Facism. Are you like my Highschool history teacher or something? Isn’t Hitler dead”

          • jonne@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            So, when you’re running, ostensibly to save democracy, you should probably offer those voters stuff that will turn them out. In 2020 Biden promised them a $2000 check, and that worked (even though he reneged on it afterwards).

            The only ones to blame are the Democrats. Trump got less votes than in 2020, so it’s not like he got more popular, the Democrats failed to get their base out. You can’t even blame the Greens this time.

            • Kernal64@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Trump is currently sitting at 75.6 million votes, with a few states still finishing off their counts. His 2020 total was 74.2 million. He’s not only already got more votes than he did in 2020, but he’s on track to eclipse that amount even further. Meanwhile Harris is at 71 million vs Biden’s 81 million. So yeah, Dem voters didn’t show up because the lives of their fellow Americans don’t really mean anything to them, but either some of them flipped for Trump or more people who typically sit out elections showed up for him. The numbers show Trump did get more popular. This is apparently what our country wants.

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 days ago

                I don’t think that MAGA is an existential threat to democracy, or to Americans’ lives. If it were, Pres. Biden would do something about it, right? Like, maybe, lock them up. Or at least say so. He certainly wouldn’t be planning to just hand over the reins and walk away.

                (P.S. If you can’t tell if the above is serious, then why couldn’t millions of voters actually think this way?)

      • hark@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        That democrats weren’t even willing to budge on their support for genocide means that they don’t actually mind fascism. They can scream on and on about how dangerous trump is, but when they’re kissing dick cheney’s ass and trying to court other such “moderate” fascists, then they’re just full of shit. So yes, it is largely the fault of democrats, who are the only other viable party in the country, for not fighting fascism. They set themselves up as the only solution and then failed to get the votes. Reminder that this is the same party boosting the campaigns of far-right candidates just so they can point at how crazy their opponents are. All they’re accomplishing is helping out the fascist cause, which again, democrats don’t seem to mind based on their actions.

        • minnow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          7 days ago

          They didn’t “set themselves up as the only solution.” We have First Past the Post voting, that’s just how it works.

      • Omega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve reached across the aisle to vote for a conservative for 3 elections now against Trump. It would be nice if centrists and conservatives did the same.

        If anything non-voter related is to blame, it’s the global economy which has shifted every single developed country away from the party in charge. But that doesn’t excuse the non-voters.

        Now let’s get Ukraine everything we possibly can and put as much pressure on Israel as possible.

      • FreakinSteve@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You’re defending the people who embraced the Cheneys and told Bernie and Tlaib to get fucked. Cutting off money and weapons to Israel- who represent only 2.4% of the US population- to end a genocide was the easiest possible win imaginable.

        • minnow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If by “defending” you mean “placing blame where it belongs” then yeah.

          Like, if a serial killer has killed ten people then gets charged with killing an eleventh, but he didn’t, then I’d “defend” him too because the person who actually did the crime is still out there and should be held accountable.

          You’re making it out as if I’m trying to say the serial killer didn’t murder anybody. That’s not what I’m saying.

          The Democrats fucked up, big time. But it’s the electorate who let a fascist win.

      • Resonosity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        You would, but millions of Americans wouldn’t. Those Americans act out of self-interest, and the economy was the biggest pain point with most voters this past election.

        Instead of catering to the middle class, what Dems’ base has been historically, Harris campaigned to business owners with tax incentives/breaks.

        Democrats failed. Hell, Harris could have even lied just as Obama did to get Democrats and moderates to believe that she represents them. But she didn’t!

      • Ruxias@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I’m with you that fascism is alive and well in the states, no doubt.

        But you have to see that years of “fascist” accusations from anyone even slightly left has watered down any impact that language might have had. Most people who are and have been on the receiving end of that accusation just roll their eyes when they hear the word - regardless if it’s true or not. It comes off to them as a “blue hair” reee-ing.

        Just letting you know most people don’t take it with the same gravity any more. To most people “real” fascism was a 1940’s thing, and fascism now is just an insult throw around by keyboard warriors and “SJWs” - whom they find annoying and pathetic.

        The term, however appropriate, doesn’t affect people’s political decisions as much as you would think.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 days ago

          R’s have learned to change their boogiemen occasionally while keeping them substantially similar. Is DEI or CRT substantially different then “Political correctness gone wild”? Not even a little. But it feels new.

          • Ruxias@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            You’re right, that is a thing they do.

            I see my original comment got at least one down vote because we’re still in the “denial” phase. It’s the truth though: most people, however wrong they may be, view the fascist label as just another flippantly-tossed insult not to be taken seriously.

  • Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    The DNC would rather lose with a neoliberal than win with a progressive. If they want to get there shit together they have to win with the working class and ordinary people.

    They can’t be elitist centrists. They’ll lose every election if they do. The future is now old man

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      If they go further left they lose every moderate or right leaning Democratic voter don’t they? Why would you want your voter base to get smaller

      • stephan262@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        So is it that leftists are too small a group to be worth making political concessions to, or are they a large enough group to have an effect on elections?

        Why do Democrats feel entitled to the support of the left when they don’t offer anything to the left?

  • rigatti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    The left didn’t vote against fascism, but also the center didn’t. And the right, obviously.

  • Resonosity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who said Lefts didn’t vote for Harris?

    Are you manufacturing this? Where are the exit polls?

    Might a better reason for why Fascism won with this election be that Democrats, including Biden, Harris, the DNC, and the consulting class, failed to campaign to their own base, and even more than their base since most Americans, Dems and Reps, approve of progressive policies?

    Projection man

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      It’s funny cause back when Biden was VP I kept bringing up how he was a terrible Democrat and we should stop making cute uncle Joe memes, cause he’s actually a horrible person who has hurt a lot of people with his blind drug war. And when I would bring that up, the other leftists would downvote me and call me a right winger, because we’re not allowed to criticize our own n side apparently.

      So it’s funny that the same people who used to downvote any criticism of “uncle Joe” are the ones that are now calling anyone a Nazi if they support the Democrats.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    They share the blame, certainly, especially in depressing left-leaning turnout, but I think it was largely ‘swing voter’ twats sitting it out.

    Suppose we’ll find out when more detailed analysis of this utter fuck-up and handing the keys to one of the most powerful countries in the world to fascists is available.

      • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        “Too radical”

        “Not radical enough”

        “Trump Lite”

        “Didn’t care about Trump voters”

        “Another predicable establishment candidate”

        “We didn’t know her”

        “All she said was she not the other guy”

        “Didn’t expose Trump enough”

        “Joy bullshit! Where are the serious policies?”

        “Elections are about feelings and she didn’t have appeal”

        “Supports the Gaza genocide”

        “Didn’t inspire pro-Israel voters”

        “Failed border czar”

        “Blue MAGA”

        Everyone seems to think they know why Harris lost, and it’s always “didn’t do enough of what I like”. It’s boring and unhelpful.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        The Dems running a wet rag is a significant failing and they share the blame for fascism coming into power.

        At the same time, that in no way excuses the thought process of any voter who sat by and said, “I don’t like the wet rag. Let’s go with fascism instead!”

      • minnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        This may come as a surprise to you, but yes, in a democracy the people are to blame for who gets elected.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          In a functional democracy, the candidates would run on things people want. Instead, both parties cater to what the elites want.

          The difference between Republicans and Democrats is whether they pay lip service to these policies or not (then Democrats find a way to not pass whatever that policy is, whether it’s with a rotating villain, the parliamentarian, keeping the filibuster, etc).

          • minnow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            7 days ago

            No? No. Democracy, functional or not, has no direct determining power on what candidates cater to. What democracy does is select the winning candidate, regardless of who the candidate caters to.

            We may be a flawed democracy with candidates that cater to the elites, but we’re still a democracy and we still pick the winner.

            • jonne@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              If democracy doesn’t work for the majority of people, and your party runs on ‘rescuing’ that same democracy while at the same time villinaising the people that do want to improve the people’s economic conditions, you’re not going to be winning elections.

              If you want to rescue democracy, you need to show that democracy can work for people, it’s the same mistake Weimar Germany made.

              • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                It’s hard to elect one person that works for the majority of the people. The majority of the people aren’t a homogenous group. Not everybody agrees on which policies are the best.

                • jonne@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  There’s a huge range of policies that poll in the 80-90% range that neither party wants to touch because they upset the donor class.

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m doing my part! I’m yelling at leftists on the internet!

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Yep, that’s why I used my totally meaningless non-swingstate vote for Cornel West.

    The libs aren’t actually mad about how people voted because the vast majority of votes don’t matter. They’re mad about the thought crime. They’re mad about being exposed as politicians without principles who aren’t even good politicians. They’re mad that people don’t like their dear leader. Libs like to see themselves are genoius thought leaders of some grand nation instead of just capitalist shills enabling fascism.

  • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s some non-zero number of voters who planned to vote for Biden, couldn’t find his name on the ballot, and subsequently filled in the only other name of a President they saw.

    “Yeah, he did the job before, he’s got experience…”

  • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lmao lib shit tally:

    Bullshit corporate media reference, check. Blaming the minority for the failure of the party, check Believing politics happens once every four years, check.

  • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    We wanted to, but kept hearing that voting 3rd party was a “waste”.

    Disclaimer: I voted for the lesser fascist and don’t support Stein.

  • inv3r510n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I did my part. I voted third party because BOTH PARTIES SUPPORT A FASCIST REGIME COMMITTING GENOCIDE WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS WHILE OUR OWN PEOPLE GO HOMELESS

    Cry about it libs! I bet going further right and further ignoring your base will win in 2028! Might as well run Liz Cheney while you’re at it!

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes that is the not voting against fascism the meme is talking about. You can label not doing your part as doing your part but it’s still not doing your part.