I thought a group dedicated to ensuring the matters affecting any group of peoples are represented in Parliament would be a good thing. And if this is not “good enough”, how will it have a worse outcome than voting no.

  • Narc0@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yours is the most just understandable explanation so far. But I don’t know if I understand this ‘progressive no’ argument.

    I believe we, the Australian people, owe the indigenous peoples a greater weight on those opinion. This is their land after all.

    • Knoll0114@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not everyone would agree with you on that belief though, hence some of the disagreement.