Labor's latest plan to 'stamp out' vaping will go before the Senate this week, says Mark Butler, the federal health minister. Subscribe to Guardian Australia...

What are people’s thoughts here? I could understand removing all the lolly flavours and regulating like other tobacco products. I am an ex-smoker but I personally feel like this is govt over-reach. That might be an out-dated mindset of my time & generation (genX), however. So I’m interested to get some insight into how the broader population view this issue, particularly the younger generations, in both an overall opinion, but also in regards to such govt controls of recreational substances vs an individual’s right of freedom to choose.

    • NathA
      2·
      6 months ago

      Is it worse than actual smoking, though?

      • SarsaparillaOP
        2·
        6 months ago

        A study measuring the aerosols from two vape users and comparing it with secondhand cigarette smoke found vapes produced a much lower level of ultrafine particles, but a much higher level of nanoparticles. It is not clear what risk these pose. Another study found vape use increased fine particles in a room’s air.

        From SMH: Is secondhand vaping a growing threat or ‘fake news’?

        It would seem the science is still not in on just how dangerous it is, but further in the article it says:

        The question, says Demaio, is whether we should wait for conclusive evidence before taking action.

        “We don’t have any long-term studies on the safety of these products, or on the safety of secondhand exposure. It took us 20 years to realise it [tobacco] was causing damage in the next generation of kids who were living with others who smoked.

        “My worry is we take another two or three decades to realise the same thing.”

    • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      2·
      6 months ago

      The problem is this applies equally well to stuff like eating fast food or not doing cardio 3x a week.

      I’m an ex smoker for context, I hate this fucking shit but we don’t offer any real support to prevent addiction and just punish people for it.

      I’m 100% plain packaging and selling behind counter (for all drugs, all products really ought to have advertising bans and plain packaging but I’ll never win that one). I’m also in favour of making addicting stuff boring. But after that people are ultimately free to make bad choices (I write, sprawled with terrible posture, a glass of wine, and some chips) and leaving the TGA to authorise these will mean none get approved and a black market will be created anyway.

        • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          21·
          6 months ago

          Oh but don’t they?

          People who don’t do cardio might be more likely to have a heart attack while driving, or otherwise drive at a lower level of alertness (cardio improved cognitive performance and slows decline) hence increasing their chances of hitting someone.

          Or perhaps they cost the state more in health (tbh probably like smokers they cost less but this is the common justification for the sin tax on smoking) which damages your ability to get your health issues attended too.

          People drinking alcohol are more likely to engage in violence, and do actually pose a risk to people around them statistically.

          Obvs this stuff is reaching, but so is most of the health stuff on vaping so far (most harm demonstrated is due to ‘popcorn lung’ which is basically a result of lack of regulation meaning a certain flavour got used despite this known side effect) and the point is we need to consider degrees.

          We live in a society and there aren’t super clear boundaries on what we ought to be able to do. The current proposed law, which again I’m broadly in favour of, does massively fuck up by placing vapes under the TGA. That means they need to be regulated as medical devices which means unless you can show a vape has a medical reason to be on the market it wont be approved.

          Since that will never happen (except, maybe as a cessation tool but the TGA will have high standards of evidence) this is still a ban on vaping, just the long way round. Note how CBD is legal and OTC except there are no approved CBD products for OTC.

            • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              21·
              6 months ago

              What is the immediate health effect of a nearby vaper? Like seriously I actually don’t know of any solid evidence. In it’s most basic formulation it is literally just a fog machine.

                • naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  2·
                  6 months ago

                  For both of our convenience I would really appreciate it if you just listed the specific concerns you had in mind, along with a primary source.

                  If a primary source is too much because you believe something is “common knowledge” (e.g. asking for a primary source on why to look both ways before crossing the road is a bit pedantic) a relevant Wikipedia page about the immediate health concern would be fine.

                  Let’s exclude popcorn lung (diacetyl damage) for aforementioned reasons.

                  I’d also like to ask, are you concerned about fog machines which also make a vapour of vegetable glycerine? Or are your concerns limited to flavour compounds and trace nicotine exposure?