• DavidDoesLemmyOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I think if you choose to do something that puts people at a higher risk than necessary, you should be responsible for the consequences.

    If you drink drive and kill someone, you can’t say it was an accident. If you’re doing burnouts in a crowded street and kill someone, you can’t say you didn’t mean it. Same with speeding. Driving a death machine puts us all at a heightened risk, and when things go wrong, there should be consequences.

    The people who died in Daylesford definitely had consequences of this drivers choice. Why shouldn’t the driver have consequences?

    • Dkarma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Generally you don’t prosecute someone who had a medical issue while driving regardless of how large their vehicle is.

      What an utterly insane take you got here.

      • DavidDoesLemmyOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Why don’t you try giving a counter argument instead of resorting to hyperbole.

      • DavidDoesLemmyOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        So your argument is that it’s not generally done? I know that it’s not generally done. I was talking about what I want to happen.