Australians have resoundingly rejected a proposal to recognise Aboriginal people in its constitution and establish a body to advise parliament on Indigenous issues.

Saturday’s voice to parliament referendum failed, with the defeat clear shortly after polls closed.

  • Whirlybird
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cautious of giving the government more power. Government.

    The voice as it was would have been ripe for abuse by the government. They could just put any of their cronies in the voice advisory role and just have it go “yeah the indigenous people agree that you should make more mines where our heritage sites are”.

    • Ilandar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      deleted by creator

      • Whirlybird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It still wouldn’t have given them any more power, because it fundamentally did not have any power to give.

        It would though, because it would now give the government the ability to say that they listened to and consulted with the indigenous advisory board, made up of white mining magnates and pauline hanson, and then went ahead and leased out the indigenous cultural land for mining for 100 years. See? The government can no go ahead and do things that harm indigenous culture and people while being able to have the full backing of the indigenous voice to parliament.

        You not understanding the ways that this position was ripe for abuse by the government isn’t suprising, nor is your trying to pass it of as me changing my tune.

        I didn’t say the Voice has any power. It doesn’t. What I’m saying is that the voice existing gives the GOVERNMENT more power.

          • Whirlybird
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they didn’t have an indigenous voice behind their decisions before. Now they would have.

            • Ilandar
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              deleted by creator

              • Whirlybird
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re getting mixed up. Seems to be a common thing with you. It’s almost like it’s intentional so you can try and call other people disingenuous etc.

                The voice has no power for the indigenous people it’s supposed to represent.

                The voice gives the government more power to do things that negatively affect indigenous people.

                This isn’t rocket science. Do you understand yet?