• maniacalmanicmania
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it’s anything nefarious. More like Labor shooting themselves in the foot by running a shit campaign.

    • Whirlybird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Very possible unfortunately. Not having an answer for basic questions like how many people are appointed, how they’re appointed, and for how long is pathetic.

      The cynic in me goes straight to that there’s a reason why they’re not divulging these things and it’s because the yes voters wouldn’t like the answers.

      • billytheid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        More billshit, that assertion has already been directly disproven earlier in this thread. Why are you so committed to posting misinformation?

        • Whirlybird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It was not disproven. If it is then you should be able to answer my questions in the comment you replied to then, right?

          How many people are appointed?

          How are they appointed?

          How long are the terms of appointment?

          • Ilandar
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Someone already answered this for you here. I have engaged with you in good faith previously, but it’s becoming increasingly clear you are completely full of shit and are simply attempting to spread doubt and fear.

            • Whirlybird
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m not “attemping to spread” anything. I’m undecided on how I’m going to vote and I’m trying to decide.

              Why do some of you guys just attribute everything you don’t like to malice?

              • Ilandar
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “Trying to decide”? Let’s review the evidence:

                • Repeatedly asks the same textbook conservative No campaign questions in every thread.

                • Refuses to read any of the replies - even when they directly answer the questions being asked.

                • Openly lies and says no one has answered the questions, even when there is clear evidence to the contrary.

                Hmm, I’m gonna go with a [X] Doubt on that one bro.

                • Whirlybird
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I’m not a “conservative”. Have literally never voted for the LNP. I’ve voted for the greens more than I’ve voted for Labor in my 20+ years of voting.

                  Quit with the bullshit accusations.

                  What you call “answering the questions” is not what I consider an actual answer to the question being asked. The real answer as I know it now is “it’s up to the government post referendum, and can change whenever the government at the time wants”, but those aren’t the “answers” being thrown around.

                  You’re the person that said unless you’ve had a lived experience that makes you want to vote No, you should vote yes. That’s ridiculous. Automatically assuming it’s a good thing is dumb, though I’m not surprised with your “you’re an undercover conservative running a fud campaign” comment.

                  • Ilandar
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not a “conservative”.

                    I never said you were. Strawman harder.

                    What you call “answering the questions” is not what I consider an actual answer to the question being asked.

                    Someone literally gave you direct answers to all the questions you asked, as well as a link to where they could be found. You never replied to that comment. In fact, you straight up ignored it then continued to ask the same questions later as if they hadn’t already been answered hours ago.

                    Automatically assuming it’s a good thing is dumb

                    Another strawman. Do you have anything of substance to say or is it just going to be crying from now on?

          • billytheid
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Read the responses others have already posted; you’ll find that your asinine bullshit has already been roundly disproved. You’re constantly posting content you know is false. Why?