• ByteJunk@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        It does a stellar job of creating innovations that maximize profits, just look at enshitification! A masterpiece in shareholder value.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I assume, based on the format of Twitter/Mastodon, as well as using Twitter for many years, that Mastodon is full of Libertarian cutting edge tech bros that see capitalism as a natural order of things.

    • Formes@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Capitalism isn’t to blame for this. The Individuals who buy it are.

      I bought DIV, I got value out of it. I won’t be buying micro transactions, and unless D4 sees one hell of an overhaul to it’s end game and encounter design - I won’t be going back ever. Comparing it to other games I have purchased in the last couple of years, I would say DIV is the game I have gotten the LEAST value out of, which is surprising considering historically Blizzard games tended to be the top tier in terms of dollar per hour of enjoyable play time I got out of said games.

      Onto Capitalism. Capitalism needs two things to function:

      1. A Basic Standard of Living Provided by some entity - historically the Church served this purpose. But currently there is nothing that actually serves this purpose - Welfare is a poverty trap, minimum wages require multiple full time jobs in many places, and where housing is affordable - jobs are lacking in many cases.

      2. Supply + Demand Market Considerations - if you make a product people don’t buy: You will fail. If you over charge, a cometitor can move in and steal your lunch money. The reason we have IP laws (Patent, and Copyright) is duplicating hard work done, is far easier than doing your own work - so, we protect the human labour component (which is why I do think AI generated art should NOT be copyrightable, but the AI models and the work that goes into selecting assets to train the model with, fine tuning the weighting, and creating filters to attain desirable outcomes - that is reasonable to copyright).

      The failure of NeoLiberalism, and the Industrial age in general is we took the responsibility the Church and the Tithe that was paid to it away from the church, replaced it with work houses with piss poor conditions, and allowed a blaming of unforutnate individuals who couldn’t find work - and blamed them for being lazy, instead of treating them with respect and dignity as every human should be treated.

      By the way: This is why, I support the idea of a Universal Basic Income. Scrap Welfare, Scrap old age, Scrap food stamps. Universal basic income - and give people the power to find meaningful work. Give people the foundation to take a risk in starting up a small business to improve their lot in life where work is slim pickings, or all the employers are asshole middle managers that are instructed to pay piss poor wages. Capitalism actually would be liable to work FAR BETTER. And besides - you would likely see crime rates in plenty of places basically drop off a cliff as people would not need to turn to crime to ensure they can make rent, keep a roof over their head, or just pay for food.

      Capitalism is not the problem. NeoLiberal Ideology is. A Failure to put in working policies to help actual people is a problem - and the “left wing” and “socialist” parties of the last several decades have all failed to bring meaningful positive change to the working class. But that should surprise no one given the track record of left wing authoritarian regimes.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s 1000% capitalism bro. The thing you’re describing is commerce. Commerce is the act of doing business. Goods/Services for Consideration.

        Drop the history lesson. You don’t know what you’re talking about.

        • Formes@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I would suggest you actually go read The Wealth of Nations. Fascinating read. Then go take a look at who Adam Smith was, the conditions he lived in, and the world he lived in. Because while a lot of people are TOLD about adam smith, it is frighteningly few who read the works or study the history to which it was written.

          We haven’t had the Capitalism that he wrote about for the better part of 200 years. What we have is a system that protects ever fewer corporations through protectionist policies that allow for monopolies to be shielded from competition. This is functionally what the extention of Copyright Law has enabled.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    If people stopped paying ridiculous prices for cosmetic shit like this maybe we could see reasonable prices like $1 recolours of things. There’s absolutely no reason changing the colour of something should cost $30 other than the fact that people fucking pay for it, and it means other more sensible dollar-conscious players get priced out of the fun little things like that.

    • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Uh… I don’t think recoloring something in a game I already paid for should cost anything.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh well, the market clearly accepts paid cosmetics. It sucks for people who don’t spend money on it like me but at the end of the day people will blow cash on it and that’s why it keeps getting up charged.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If it didn’t cost anything they wouldn’t do it at all. You already paid for it, they have your money. They do the extra stuff to try and squeeze out more money.

          • folkrav@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            They couldn’t charge for it, cause games were mostly offline. In this era of always-online stuff… People pay for it. Not the majority, but there are enough whales to cover for everyone, apparently… So companies do it. Gaming has become an industry. It’s not run by passionate developers anymore, but by investors. Why would they not charge for it in this time and age? There is literally no incentive, from their perspective of “we’re selling a product”.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Addicted people with poor self-control are abused in these kind of microtransactions. This should be illegal.

  • Brocon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Or you could get Last Epoch. And maybe start enjoy playing an ARPG again in the process.

  • PM_ME_YOUR_ZOD_RUNES@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Who cares, the game is boring as fuck. Told myself I was never gonna get this garbage after they butchered Diablo 3 so bad. Saw it on sale for 50$ during the holidays, gave in and bought it. Fuck do I regret it. It’s just slow, repetitive and uninteresting. Quit after I got to level 50, shit was mind numbing.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’ve been boycotting Blizzard since the bNetD lawsuit & haven’t regretted my decision yet.

    The level of contempt they have for their players is amazing.

    • Drewski@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      For me it was when they banned Blitzchung from a Hearthstone tournament and took away his prize money for supporting Hong Kong freedom. I haven’t regretted it since they don’t make good games anymore like they did when I was growing up.

  • Pohl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    You never know how other people value their money. Some people buy a $3500 AR headset. Some people buy a truck that costs more than they make in a year. Some people pay 30USD to make the portals a different color.

    I have NEVER bough a cosmetic item in a game, I truly do not understand people who do. But, people love that shit so who am I to say it shouldn’t be available to them?

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m someone who can’t find a game without dollar signs in it anymore because these idiots are reinforcing shitty practices. Fuck them all.

      • Pohl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Modern games cost WAY too much to make and the industry has come up with the worst possible way to solve that problem. If you want to make a single player game with modern graphics that sells for 70$ and has a few 30$ dlcs, it HAS to be a huge hit or your going out of business. There are very few studios left with the guts and confidence to make that sort of wild “all-in” bet.

        The worst part is that games production costs are almost all labor cost so making games cheaper means making games with less people. There is no worker friendly future for games but free to play cash grab skinner boxes.

        Making art with 100s of millions in budget requires a hell of a patron. There is no market way to get the Sistine Chapel.

  • Defaced@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Simple solution, ditch diablo 4 and play last epoch instead. D4 is a fucking disgrace of a game.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    It still cracks me up when I see quotes of reddit users in a random thread (taken as a newsworthy story, lol). It makes me wonder how far it can go with obscene usernames. Imagine having a good breakdown of a problem posted by someone called AnalNosferatu69 that you just can’t quote.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 months ago

      When they make low effort cosmetics they are both restricting features that could be in the game and incentivizing themselves to prohibit a modding community that adds a ton to games for free.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Once upon a time, I would’ve agreed with you… until I heard that Epic Games got in trouble for trying to create a culture in Fortnite that shames and bullies kids for using the default skins. The advertising around cosmetics is as psychologically exploitative as battle passes and the like, and though they lack the same addictive qualities as lootboxes, they prey upon the same people - namely, kids and those with mental health issues that make fiscal responsibility difficult, like ADHD.

      Plus, Blizzard has a history of making in-store items higher quality than what you’d find in the game, so it does affect gameplay in the sense that you get lower quality stuff in the game as a result. Plus, look at what they did with the original Overwatch skins being paywalled when they forced people to switch to Overwatch 2. Blizzard deserves no benefit of the doubt here.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s only controversial if you were misled. If it’s just $30 for a different colored TP, then it’s just bad business and if anyone bought it, foolish consumers.