I’m sure they were trying to overthrow the government with 3 guns
Ahem, stay on topic. You said there were no guns. You insisted upon it at least 3 times. You even went as far as to lie about the article and said it proved your point. You don’t want to discuss your dishonesty?
The far right gun and 2nd amendment nuts thought they’d overthrow the firemen but just forgot their guns
Is it really a surprise to you that they’re complete idiots? And that is exactly what I claimed.
No one at the Capitol has guns. 3 people “in connection” with it were arrested and had guns, not none at the actual Capitol.
Why you lyin’?
Lonnie Leroy Coffman of Alabama was also arrested that evening after law enforcement found two firearms on his person, as well as what a federal judge referred to as a “small armory” in his truck, which was parked near the Capitol. According to the court, the government found “a loaded handgun,” “a loaded rifle,” “a loaded shotgun,” “a crossbow with bolts,” “several machetes,” “a stun gun” and “11 mason jars containing a flammable liquid, with a hole punched in the top of each jar.” According to the government, surveillance footage showed him “in attendance at the events at the Capitol,” though he has not been charged with breaching the building.
Read the fucking article. It’s been days, now. You’ve had so much time to educate yourself.
Btw I’m not offended by your childish name calling, just prefer people who are supposedly adults to have civil conversations rather than act like children and call each other names. Guess that’s asking too much of some people :)
I don’t mince my words when talking with trolls. Especially when they attempt the self-righteous tone-policing game. I’m through with civility politics. It’s not my job to sit pretty while being poked in the face, and it’s no mark of ill decorum to have little patience for it. Play games with me, I’ll play games back.
It is beyond any reasonable doubt that the Jan 6 riots were an insurrection attempt, directly and specifically instigated by Trump to voerturn an election he rightfully lost. The exact instigating incident was Trump’s claims that the election was “stolen”, and his specific call to action against it, to “fight like hell”.
If I attempt to strangle you to death, but am too weak to actually accomplish it, and don’t actually know how to strangle, does that somehow make it not attempted murder? Since when did being ill-equipped for a crime mean you’re not actually committing a crime? This is the dumbest defense, and I don’t know why you’re even trying. Why are you defending the insurrection?
There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
According to the government, surveillance footage showed him “in attendance at the events at the Capitol,” though he has not been charged with breaching the building.
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
I don’t mince my words when talking with trolls.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling), and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
It is beyond any reasonable doubt that the Jan 6 riots were an insurrection attempt, directly and specifically instigated by Trump to voerturn an election he rightfully lost.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
If I attempt to strangle you to death, but am too weak to actually accomplish it, and don’t actually know how to strangle, does that somehow make it not attempted murder?
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
Didn’t I already prove this wrong?
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
Wow, even when you have the evidence in front of you, you still lie. “In attendance” is not the same as “in connection with”. “In attendance” means they were there.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling),
Any proof of this? I don’t think people who dislike Radiohead are just trolling. I don’t think people who enjoy football are trolling. What makes you think this kneejerk reaction you imagine actually exists?
and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
“Insult make dumb”. Sure. I’m calling you a moron because you’re a moron. It’s simply a factual statement, when confronted with someone who views reality yet reports a delusion. Though I suppose I ought to be more precise: deluded moron.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Man, I’m so stumped. That 5th cry-laugh really won me over, really proved me wrong, definitely a mature response!
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
No, not at all. This is blatant denial. There are photos of the event happening, taken by those in attendance. You have absolutely no room to deny that Jan 6 happened. In fact, I revise my analogy - if I attempt badly to strange you, and take photos of the failed attempt, is this not still attempted strangling? Would you not find it odd that people pointed to my photos as evidence it was just a photo op, and to the fact you didn’t die as evidence I wasn’t trying to kill you?
You’re really stuck on this “selfie” point. Is that what your thought leader told you to focus on?
Do you think that taking a photo while you’re committing a crime means you didn’t commit a crime?
If I take a selfie while strangling you, did I really strangle you, or did I just take a selfie?
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
I’m sorry but if you really believe that they all just forgot to take their guns when their plan was to storm the capitol building with their guns and take prisoners and hang people then there is no point even continuing here because you’re delusional and drank way too much kool-aid.
Ahem, stay on topic. You said there were no guns. You insisted upon it at least 3 times. You even went as far as to lie about the article and said it proved your point. You don’t want to discuss your dishonesty?
Is it really a surprise to you that they’re complete idiots? And that is exactly what I claimed.
Why you lyin’?
Read the fucking article. It’s been days, now. You’ve had so much time to educate yourself.
I don’t mince my words when talking with trolls. Especially when they attempt the self-righteous tone-policing game. I’m through with civility politics. It’s not my job to sit pretty while being poked in the face, and it’s no mark of ill decorum to have little patience for it. Play games with me, I’ll play games back.
It is beyond any reasonable doubt that the Jan 6 riots were an insurrection attempt, directly and specifically instigated by Trump to voerturn an election he rightfully lost. The exact instigating incident was Trump’s claims that the election was “stolen”, and his specific call to action against it, to “fight like hell”.
If I attempt to strangle you to death, but am too weak to actually accomplish it, and don’t actually know how to strangle, does that somehow make it not attempted murder? Since when did being ill-equipped for a crime mean you’re not actually committing a crime? This is the dumbest defense, and I don’t know why you’re even trying. Why are you defending the insurrection?
There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling), and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
Didn’t I already prove this wrong?
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
Wow, even when you have the evidence in front of you, you still lie. “In attendance” is not the same as “in connection with”. “In attendance” means they were there.
Any proof of this? I don’t think people who dislike Radiohead are just trolling. I don’t think people who enjoy football are trolling. What makes you think this kneejerk reaction you imagine actually exists?
“Insult make dumb”. Sure. I’m calling you a moron because you’re a moron. It’s simply a factual statement, when confronted with someone who views reality yet reports a delusion. Though I suppose I ought to be more precise: deluded moron.
Man, I’m so stumped. That 5th cry-laugh really won me over, really proved me wrong, definitely a mature response!
No, not at all. This is blatant denial. There are photos of the event happening, taken by those in attendance. You have absolutely no room to deny that Jan 6 happened. In fact, I revise my analogy - if I attempt badly to strange you, and take photos of the failed attempt, is this not still attempted strangling? Would you not find it odd that people pointed to my photos as evidence it was just a photo op, and to the fact you didn’t die as evidence I wasn’t trying to kill you?
You’re really stuck on this “selfie” point. Is that what your thought leader told you to focus on?
Do you think that taking a photo while you’re committing a crime means you didn’t commit a crime?
If I take a selfie while strangling you, did I really strangle you, or did I just take a selfie?
No, you didn’t.
I’m sorry but if you really believe that they all just forgot to take their guns when their plan was to storm the capitol building with their guns and take prisoners and hang people then there is no point even continuing here because you’re delusional and drank way too much kool-aid.
Hmmmmm. Well, the fact that they kept saying that’s what they wanted seemed pretty convincing.