There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
According to the government, surveillance footage showed him “in attendance at the events at the Capitol,” though he has not been charged with breaching the building.
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
I don’t mince my words when talking with trolls.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling), and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
It is beyond any reasonable doubt that the Jan 6 riots were an insurrection attempt, directly and specifically instigated by Trump to voerturn an election he rightfully lost.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
If I attempt to strangle you to death, but am too weak to actually accomplish it, and don’t actually know how to strangle, does that somehow make it not attempted murder?
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
Didn’t I already prove this wrong?
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
Wow, even when you have the evidence in front of you, you still lie. “In attendance” is not the same as “in connection with”. “In attendance” means they were there.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling),
Any proof of this? I don’t think people who dislike Radiohead are just trolling. I don’t think people who enjoy football are trolling. What makes you think this kneejerk reaction you imagine actually exists?
and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
“Insult make dumb”. Sure. I’m calling you a moron because you’re a moron. It’s simply a factual statement, when confronted with someone who views reality yet reports a delusion. Though I suppose I ought to be more precise: deluded moron.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
Man, I’m so stumped. That 5th cry-laugh really won me over, really proved me wrong, definitely a mature response!
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
No, not at all. This is blatant denial. There are photos of the event happening, taken by those in attendance. You have absolutely no room to deny that Jan 6 happened. In fact, I revise my analogy - if I attempt badly to strange you, and take photos of the failed attempt, is this not still attempted strangling? Would you not find it odd that people pointed to my photos as evidence it was just a photo op, and to the fact you didn’t die as evidence I wasn’t trying to kill you?
You’re really stuck on this “selfie” point. Is that what your thought leader told you to focus on?
Do you think that taking a photo while you’re committing a crime means you didn’t commit a crime?
If I take a selfie while strangling you, did I really strangle you, or did I just take a selfie?
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
I’m sorry but if you really believe that they all just forgot to take their guns when their plan was to storm the capitol building with their guns and take prisoners and hang people then there is no point even continuing here because you’re delusional and drank way too much kool-aid.
There were no guns there. No one at the actual capitol building was found to have a gun.
You’re saying they tried to overthrow the govermment. Do you think that if they were trying to do that they would have turned up without hundreds/thousands of guns, since that’s the entire point of the second amendment - to have guns to overthrow the government if/when needed? 🤡
Cool, so no one that actually went in to the capitol had any guns. Like I said, it was people “in connection” with it. You know who else they say is “in connection” with the “insurrection”? Trump. He wasn’t there.
The problem is that you incorrectly think anyone that you disagree with is a troll (name calling), and then call them names and throw childish insults. It shows a lack of intellect on your part, along with making your entire argument look childish and dumb.
😂😂😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
That’s not the situation we had though. A better example would be if you just stood next to me, doing nothing, took a selfie next to me, then walked off…and then I said you tried to strangle me.
Didn’t I already prove this wrong?
What about “incompetent” don’t you understand? If they’d done it properly, they’ve have succeeded, or at least gotten further than being locked up.
Wow, even when you have the evidence in front of you, you still lie. “In attendance” is not the same as “in connection with”. “In attendance” means they were there.
Any proof of this? I don’t think people who dislike Radiohead are just trolling. I don’t think people who enjoy football are trolling. What makes you think this kneejerk reaction you imagine actually exists?
“Insult make dumb”. Sure. I’m calling you a moron because you’re a moron. It’s simply a factual statement, when confronted with someone who views reality yet reports a delusion. Though I suppose I ought to be more precise: deluded moron.
Man, I’m so stumped. That 5th cry-laugh really won me over, really proved me wrong, definitely a mature response!
No, not at all. This is blatant denial. There are photos of the event happening, taken by those in attendance. You have absolutely no room to deny that Jan 6 happened. In fact, I revise my analogy - if I attempt badly to strange you, and take photos of the failed attempt, is this not still attempted strangling? Would you not find it odd that people pointed to my photos as evidence it was just a photo op, and to the fact you didn’t die as evidence I wasn’t trying to kill you?
You’re really stuck on this “selfie” point. Is that what your thought leader told you to focus on?
Do you think that taking a photo while you’re committing a crime means you didn’t commit a crime?
If I take a selfie while strangling you, did I really strangle you, or did I just take a selfie?
No, you didn’t.
I’m sorry but if you really believe that they all just forgot to take their guns when their plan was to storm the capitol building with their guns and take prisoners and hang people then there is no point even continuing here because you’re delusional and drank way too much kool-aid.
Hmmmmm. Well, the fact that they kept saying that’s what they wanted seemed pretty convincing.