The same person can be a customer at Walmart, a worker at Walmart, and a shareholder/owner at Walmart. Class as a Marxist concept maybe made sense when you could only be a worker or an owner. But it doesn’t work in a world where you can seamlessly switch between categories, or be all of them at the same time.
This person seems to think people are magically ordained with the elastic social mobility of bubble gum when in reality his reddit brain is made of bubble gum.
Lmao, it was something to the effect that the bazinga brain believed that social mobility was as pliable as bubblegum, but actually it was their brain that had the consistency of bubblegum.
these people have rocks in their skulls
Marx expressly addresses this a number of times in his writings.
Liberals and making arguments already explicitly disproven by books they refuse to read, NAMID.
“Oh you have $60 in stocks in a company, that makes you a capitalist.” - people who say we don’t understand economics
Basic economics
I want to see this dork seamlessly switch between Walmart greeter and Walmart owner. Just do it, if it’s that easy.
Oh boy… somebody’s gonna lose their shit when they hear about the different types of “shares” a company can buy/sell/trade.
This person seems to think people are magically ordained with the elastic social mobility of bubble gum when in reality his reddit brain is made of bubble gum.
Man whose brain is made of bubblegum: “think of social mobility like a pack of juicy fruit”
“u can have two flavors at the same time!”
What did their comment say?
Lmao, it was something to the effect that the bazinga brain believed that social mobility was as pliable as bubblegum, but actually it was their brain that had the consistency of bubblegum.